Decision Regret in Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Recipients : A Cross-sectional Analysis on Patients That Regret Their Decision After ICD Implantation

Overview

Journal Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol

Date 2020 Feb 21

PMID 32078717

Citations 2

Authors

Swaroop Varghese

J Christoph Geller

Marc-Alexander Ohlow

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are designed to deliver therapy in the event of malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Despite their benefits, some ICD recipients regret their decision on device implantation.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, predictors, and consequences of recipients that regretted their decision after implantation.

Methods: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey of consecutive ICD recipients examined during a routine outpatient follow-up visit was conducted. Their level of depression and anxiety was assessed with the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire.

Results: Of 434 ICD recipients invited to the study, 423 (97.5%) agreed and completed the survey, 349 (83%) had a primary prevention indication, and 339 (80%) ischemic cardiomyopathy. A total of 41 recipients (9.7%) regretted their decision to undergo ICD implantation. These patients were: (1) younger (63 versus 69 years), (2) more frequently in New York Heart Association (NYHA) ≥2 functional class (63% versus 22%), (3) had higher education levels (more than high-school: 76% versus 60%), (4) felt that preoperative information was lacking (22% versus 4%), (5) had more complications in the perioperative period (15% versus 3%), (6) felt less safe after ICD implantation (54% versus 5%), and (7) considered more frequently ICD deactivation during near end-of-life situations (54% versus 29%). Mean QOL and HADS scores were significantly worse in these patients (36 versus 30 and 12 versus 8.8 points, respectively; p < 0.01 for all).

Conclusion: Almost 10% of ICD recipients regretted their decision after implantation. Predictors included younger age, higher education levels, complicated perioperative period, and lack of preoperative information.

Citing Articles

Patient Information Needs and Decision-Making Before a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device: A Qualitative Study Utilizing Social Media Data.

Nicmanis M, Holmes J, Oxlad M, Chur-Hansen A J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2024; .

PMID: 38773048 DOI: 10.1007/s10880-024-10024-6.

Let It Beat: How Lifestyle and Psychosocial Factors Affect the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death-A 10-Year Follow-Up Study.

Obrova J, Sovova E, Ivanova K, Furstova J, Taborsky M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(5).

PMID: 35270315 PMC: 8909732. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052627.

References

Goldstein N, Mehta D, Siddiqui S, Teitelbaum E, Zeidman J, Singson M . "That's like an act of suicide" patients' attitudes toward deactivation of implantable defibrillators. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23 Suppl 1:7-12. PMC: 2150628. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0239-8. View

Tung R, Zimetbaum P, Josephson M . A critical appraisal of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52(14):1111-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.058. View

Finucane T . How gravely ill becomes dying: a key to end-of-life care. JAMA. 1999; 282(17):1670-2. DOI: 10.1001/jama.282.17.1670. View

Green A, Jenkins A, Masoudi F, Magid D, Kutner J, Leff B . Decision-Making Experiences of Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016; 39(10):1061-1069. PMC: 5056835. DOI: 10.1111/pace.12943. View

Thylen I, Moser D, Stromberg A . Octo- and nonagenarians' outlook on life and death when living with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2018; 18(1):250. PMC: 6195969. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-0942-9. View

Kramer D, Ottenberg A, Gerhardson S, Mueller L, Kaufman S, Koenig B . "Just Because We Can Doesn't Mean We Should": views of nurses on deactivation of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011; 32(3):243-52. PMC: 3733086. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-011-9596-7. View

Bjelland I, Dahl A, Haug T, Neckelmann D . The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002; 52(2):69-77. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00296-3. View

Zigmond A, SNAITH R . The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983; 67(6):361-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. View

Hickman Jr R, Pinto M, Lee E, Daly B . Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the decision regret scale in recipients of internal cardioverter defibrillators. J Nurs Meas. 2012; 20(1):21-34. PMC: 5456261. DOI: 10.1891/1061-3749.20.1.21. View

10.

Godemann F, Butter C, Lampe F, Linden M, Werner S, Behrens S . Determinants of the quality of life (QoL) in patients with an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD). Qual Life Res. 2004; 13(2):411-6. DOI: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018493.32844.56. View

11.

Wolff J, Roter D, Barron J, Boyd C, Leff B, Finucane T . A tool to strengthen the older patient-companion partnership in primary care: results from a pilot study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014; 62(2):312-9. PMC: 3945188. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.12639. View

12.

Vazquez L, Kuhl E, Shea J, Kirkness A, Lemon J, Whalley D . Age-specific differences in women with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: an international multi center study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008; 31(12):1528-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01223.x. View

13.

Ohlow M, Lauer B, Brunelli M, Daralammouri Y, Geller C . The Use of a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead Increases Successful Implantation Rates in Patients with Phrenic Nerve Stimulation and/or High Pacing Thresholds Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy with Conventional Bipolar Leads. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2013; 13(2):58-65. PMC: 3594899. DOI: 10.1016/s0972-6292(16)30605-2. View

14.

Butler K, Puri S . Deathbed shock: causes and cures. JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 174(1):88-9. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11125. View

15.

Thomas S, Friedmann E, Kelley F . Living with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: a review of the current literature related to psychosocial factors. AACN Clin Issues. 2001; 12(1):156-63. DOI: 10.1097/00044067-200102000-00015. View

16.

Varghese S, Geller J, Ohlow M . Phantom shocks in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: impact of education level, anxiety, and depression. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2019; 30(3):306-312. DOI: 10.1007/s00399-019-00645-y. View

17.

Goldstein N, Lampert R, Bradley E, Lynn J, Krumholz H . Management of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in end-of-life care. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141(11):835-8. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-11-200412070-00006. View

18.

Sears Jr S, Todaro J, Lewis T, Sotile W, Conti J . Examining the psychosocial impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a literature review. Clin Cardiol. 1999; 22(7):481-9. PMC: 6656039. DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960220709. View

19.

Raphael C, Koa-Wing M, Stain N, Wright I, Francis D, Kanagaratnam P . Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipient attitudes towards device deactivation: how much do patients want to know?. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011; 34(12):1628-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03223.x. View

20.

Hamilton G, Carroll D . The effects of age on quality of life in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients. J Clin Nurs. 2004; 13(2):194-200. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00846.x. View