» Articles » PMID: 32078466

Effects of Myocardial Function and Systemic Circulation on Regional Coronary Perfusion

Overview
Date 2020 Feb 21
PMID 32078466
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cardiac-coronary interaction and the effects of its pathophysiological variations on spatial heterogeneity of coronary perfusion and myocardial work are still poorly understood. This hypothesis-generating study predicts spatial heterogeneities in both regional cardiac work and perfusion that offer a new paradigm on the vulnerability of the subendocardium to ischemia, particularly at the apex. We propose a mathematical and computational modeling framework to simulate the interaction of left ventricular mechanics, systemic circulation, and coronary microcirculation. The computational simulations revealed that the relaxation rate of the myocardium has a significant effect whereas the contractility has a marginal effect on both the magnitude and transmural distribution of coronary perfusion. The ratio of subendocardial to subepicardial perfusion density () changed by -12 to +6% from a baseline value of 1.16 when myocardial contractility was varied by +25 and -10%, respectively; changed by 37% when sarcomere relaxation rate, , was faster and increased by 10% from the baseline value. The model predicts axial differences in regional myocardial work and perfusion density across the wall thickness. Regional myofiber work done at the apex is 30-50% lower than at the center region, whereas perfusion density in the apex is lower by only 18% compared with the center. There are large axial differences in coronary flow and myocardial work at the subendocardial locations, with the highest differences located at the apex region. A mismatch exists between perfusion density and regional work done at the subendocardium. This mismatch is speculated to be compensated by coronary autoregulation. We present a model of left ventricle perfusion based on an anatomically realistic coronary tree structure that includes its interaction with the systemic circulation. Left ventricular relaxation rate has a significant effect on the regional distribution of coronary flow and myocardial work.

Citing Articles

Review of cardiac-coronary interaction and insights from mathematical modeling.

Fan L, Wang H, Kassab G, Lee L WIREs Mech Dis. 2024; 16(3):e1642.

PMID: 38316634 PMC: 11081852. DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1642.


A stabilized linear finite element method for anisotropic poroelastodynamics with application to cardiac perfusion.

Thekkethil N, Rossi S, Gao H, Richardson S, Griffith B, Luo X Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2023; 405.

PMID: 37600475 PMC: 10438829. DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2022.115877.


Mechanism of exercise intolerance in heart diseases predicted by a computer model of myocardial demand-supply feedback system.

Fan L, Sun Y, Choy J, Kassab G, Lee L Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022; 227:107188.

PMID: 36334525 PMC: 11462431. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107188.


Multiscale model of the physiological control of myocardial perfusion to delineate putative metabolic feedback mechanisms.

Gharahi H, Figueroa C, Tune J, Beard D J Physiol. 2022; 600(8):1913-1932.

PMID: 35156733 PMC: 9019727. DOI: 10.1113/JP282237.


Prediction of myocardial blood flow under stress conditions by means of a computational model.

Di Gregorio S, Vergara C, Montino Pelagi G, Baggiano A, Zunino P, Guglielmo M Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022; 49(6):1894-1905.

PMID: 34984502 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05667-8.


References
1.
Jacobs J, Algranati D, Lanir Y . Lumped flow modeling in dynamically loaded coronary vessels. J Biomech Eng. 2008; 130(5):054504. DOI: 10.1115/1.2979877. View

2.
Kaimovitz B, Lanir Y, Kassab G . A full 3-D reconstruction of the entire porcine coronary vasculature. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010; 299(4):H1064-76. PMC: 2957345. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00151.2010. View

3.
Burkhoff D, de Tombe P, HUNTER W, Kass D . Contractile strength and mechanical efficiency of left ventricle are enhanced by physiological afterload. Am J Physiol. 1991; 260(2 Pt 2):H569-78. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1991.260.2.H569. View

4.
Wannenburg T, Schulman S, Burkhoff D . End-systolic pressure-volume and MVO2-pressure-volume area relations of isolated rat hearts. Am J Physiol. 1992; 262(4 Pt 2):H1287-93. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1992.262.4.H1287. View

5.
Lee J, Niederer S, Nordsletten D, Le Grice I, Smaill B, Smail B . Coupling contraction, excitation, ventricular and coronary blood flow across scale and physics in the heart. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2009; 367(1896):2311-31. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0311. View