» Articles » PMID: 32077987

Energy Minimization Within Target-directed Aiming: the Mediating Influence of the Number of Movements and Target Size

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2020 Feb 21
PMID 32077987
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In target-directed aiming, performers tend to more greatly undershoot targets when aiming down compared to up because they try to avoid an overshoot error and subsequently minimize the time and energy expenditure that is required to suddenly combat gravitational forces. The present study aims to further examine this principle of time and energy minimization by directly mediating the perceived cost of potential errors as well as the likelihood of their occurrence by manipulating the number of movements and target size, respectively. Participants executed rapid aiming movements in the up/down direction as part of a one-/two-target movement towards a small/large target. Primary movement endpoints showed greater undershooting when aiming in the downward compared to upward direction and small compared to large targets. Meanwhile, the overall movement time showed that slower movements were generated for down compared to up, but only when aiming toward large targets. The failure to mediate the central tendency as a function of the number of movements and target size indicates that the feature of minimization is highly prominent within the performers' pre-response planning. However, the continued minimization of energy in the presence of large targets may inadvertently cost the movement time.

Citing Articles

The type 1 submovement conundrum: an investigation into the function of velocity zero-crossings within two-component aiming movements.

Roberts J, Burkitt J, Elliott D Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(4):921-935.

PMID: 38329516 PMC: 10973010. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06784-0.


Upper extremity kinematics: development of a quantitative measure of impairment severity and dissimilarity after stroke.

Zaidi K, Harris-Love M PeerJ. 2023; 11:e16374.

PMID: 38089910 PMC: 10712307. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16374.


Examining the equivalence between imagery and execution within the spatial domain - Does motor imagery account for signal-dependent noise?.

Roberts J, Wood G, Wakefield C Exp Brain Res. 2020; 238(12):2983-2992.

PMID: 33084933 PMC: 7644523. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05939-z.

References
1.
Cheng D, Luis M, Tremblay L . Randomizing visual feedback in manual aiming: reminiscence of the previous trial condition and prior knowledge of feedback availability. Exp Brain Res. 2008; 189(4):403-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1436-3. View

2.
Elliott D, Dutoy C, Andrew M, Burkitt J, Grierson L, Lyons J . The influence of visual feedback and prior knowledge about feedback on vertical aiming strategies. J Mot Behav. 2014; 46(6):433-43. DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2014.933767. View

3.
Burkitt J, Staite V, Yeung A, Elliott D, Lyons J . Effector mass and trajectory optimization in the online regulation of goal-directed movement. Exp Brain Res. 2015; 233(4):1097-107. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4191-7. View

4.
Bested S, de Grosbois J, Tremblay L . Better together: Contrasting the hypotheses explaining the one-target advantage. Hum Mov Sci. 2017; 58:347-356. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.11.001. View

5.
Burkitt J, Bongers R, Elliott D, Hansen S, Lyons J . Extending Energy Optimization in Goal-Directed Aiming from Movement Kinematics to Joint Angles. J Mot Behav. 2017; 49(2):129-140. DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2016.1161592. View