» Articles » PMID: 32076628

Return to Sport and Athletic Function in an Active Population After Primary Arthroscopic Labral Reconstruction of the Hip

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2020 Feb 21
PMID 32076628
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Labral reconstruction has been advocated as an alternative to debridement for the treatment of irreparable labral tears, showing favorable short-term results. However, literature is scarce regarding outcomes and return to sport in the nonelite athletic population.

Purpose: To report minimum 1-year clinical outcomes and the rate of return to sport in athletic patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with labral reconstruction in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and irreparable labral tears.

Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed for patients who underwent an arthroscopic labral reconstruction between August 2012 and December 2017. Patients were included if they identified as an athlete (high school, college, recreational, or amateur); had follow-up on the following patient-reported outcomes (PROs): modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sport Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), and visual analog scale (VAS); and completed a return-to-sport survey at 1 year postoperatively. Patients were excluded if they underwent any previous ipsilateral hip surgery, had dysplasia, or had prior hip conditions. The proportions of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for mHHS and HOS-SSS were calculated. Statistical significance was set at = .05.

Results: There were 32 (14 females) athletes who underwent primary arthroscopic labral reconstruction during the study period. The mean age and body mass index of the group were 40.3 years (range, 15.5-58.7 years) and 27.9 kg/m (range, 19.6-40.1 kg/m), respectively. The mean follow-up was 26.4 months (range, 12-64.2 months). All patients demonstrated significant improvement in mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, and VAS ( < .001) at latest follow-up. Additionally, 84.4% achieved MCID and 81.3% achieved PASS for mHHS, and 87.5% achieved MCID and 75% achieved PASS for HOS-SSS. VAS pain scores decreased from 4.4 to 1.8, and the satisfaction with surgery was 7.9 out of 10. The rate of return to sport was 78%.

Conclusion: At minimum 1-year follow-up, primary arthroscopic labral reconstruction, in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and irreparable labral tears, was associated with significant improvement in PROs in athletic populations. Return to sport within 1 year of surgery was 78%.

Citing Articles

Failed labral reconstruction of the hip can be successfully revised to another labral reconstruction: improved patient-reported outcomes at a minimum of 2-year follow-up.

White B, Swann R, Spears H, Shafer A, Constantinides S J Hip Preserv Surg. 2025; 11(4):271-279.

PMID: 39839555 PMC: 11744474. DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnae033.


Return to Sport Following Arthroscopic Management of Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review.

Lucenti L, Maffulli N, Bardazzi T, Saggini R, Memminger M, Simeone F J Clin Med. 2024; 13(17).

PMID: 39274432 PMC: 11395971. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13175219.


Comparative analysis between operative and non-operative acetabular labral tear injuries in division 1 collegiate athletes.

Hyland Jr S, Maeso A, Rogers M, Goforth M, Brolinson P Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):9461.

PMID: 37301848 PMC: 10257656. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36454-0.


Allograft Labral Reconstruction of the Hip: Expanding Evidence Supporting Greater Utilization in Hip Arthroscopy.

White B, Constantinides S Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2022; 15(2):27-37.

PMID: 35141846 PMC: 9076780. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-022-09741-y.


All-suture anchors in arthroscopic acetabular labral repair: our experience.

Di Benedetto P, Giovanni G, Luigi C, Francesco M, Piero G, Causero A Acta Biomed. 2020; 91(4-S):85-91.

PMID: 32555081 PMC: 7944822. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v91i4-S.9661.


References
1.
Maldonado D, LaReau J, Perets I, Ortiz-Declet V, Laseter J, Lall A . Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy With Concomitant Periacetabular Osteotomy, Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2019; 35(3):826-834. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.143. View

2.
Chandrasekaran S, Gui C, Walsh J, Lodhia P, Suarez-Ahedo C, Domb B . Correlation Between Changes in Visual Analog Scale and Patient-Reported Outcome Scores and Patient Satisfaction After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017; 5(9):2325967117724772. PMC: 5600309. DOI: 10.1177/2325967117724772. View

3.
Menge T, Briggs K, Dornan G, McNamara S, Philippon M . Survivorship and Outcomes 10 Years Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: Labral Debridement Compared with Labral Repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99(12):997-1004. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01060. View

4.
Levy D, Kuhns B, Chahal J, Philippon M, Kelly B, Nho S . Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes With Respect to Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State and Minimal Clinically Important Difference. Arthroscopy. 2016; 32(9):1877-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.014. View

5.
Youm T . Editorial Commentary: Wanted Dead or Alive: Primary Allograft Labral Reconstruction of the Hip Is As Successful, if Not More Successful, Than Primary Labral Repair. Arthroscopy. 2018; 34(2):441-443. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.09.011. View