» Articles » PMID: 32075665

Initiating Renal Replacement Therapy Through Incremental Haemodialysis: Protocol for a Randomized Multicentre Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal Trials
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2020 Feb 21
PMID 32075665
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Thrice-weekly haemodialysis is the usual dose when starting renal replacement therapy; however, this schedule is no longer appropriate since it does not consider residual renal function. Several reports have suggested the potential benefit of beginning haemodialysis less frequently and incrementally increasing the dose as the residual renal function decreases. However, all the data published so far are from observational studies. Thus, this clinical trial avoids any potential selection bias and will assess the possible benefits that have been observed in observational studies.

Methods/design: This report describes the study protocol of a randomized prospective multi-centre open-label clinical trial to evaluate whether starting renal replacement therapy with twice-weekly haemodialysis sessions preserves residual renal function better than the standard thrice-weekly regimen. We also explore other clinical parameters, such as concentrations of uremic toxins, dialysis doses, control of anaemia, removal of medium-weight uremic toxins, nutritional status, quality of life, hospital admissions and mortality. Only incident haemodialysis patients who can maintain a urea clearance rate KrU ≥ 2.5 mL/min/1.73 m are eligible. Patient recruitment began on 1 January 2017 and will last for 2 years or until the required sample size has been recruited to ensure the established statistical power has been reached. The minimum follow-up period will be 1 year. Anuric patients with acute renal failure and patients who return to haemodialysis after a kidney transplant failure are excluded. It has been calculated that 44 patients should be recruited into each group to achieve a power of 80% in a two-sided comparison of means with a usual significance level of 0.05. A time-to-event analysis will estimate the probability of kidney function survival in both groups using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival curves will be compared with log-rank tests. This survival analysis will be complemented with a proportional hazard model to estimate the hazard ratio of kidney function survival adjusted for any confounding factors. Analyses will be carried out in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle.

Discussion: The incremental initiation of dialysis may preserve residual renal function better than the conventional treatment, with similar or higher survival rates, as reported by observational studies. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical trial to evaluate whether initiating renal replacement therapy with twice-weekly haemodialysis sessions preserves residual renal function better than beginning with the standard thrice-weekly regimen.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03302546. Registered on 5 October 2017.

Citing Articles

Incremental hemodialysis and vascular access complications: a 12-year experience in a hospital hemodialysis unit.

Fernandez Lucas M, Piris Gonzalez M, Diaz Dominguez M, Collado Alsina A, Rodriguez Mendiola N J Nephrol. 2024; 37(7):1929-1937.

PMID: 38837005 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-024-01932-9.


Incremental dialysis: two complementary views.

Casino D, Murea M, Floege M, Zoccali C Clin Kidney J. 2024; 17(2):sfae020.

PMID: 38404364 PMC: 10894032. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae020.


Incremental dialysis: review of the literature with pediatric perspective.

Munshi R, Swartz S Pediatr Nephrol. 2023; 39(1):49-55.

PMID: 37306719 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-023-06030-9.


Time-averaged concentration estimation of uraemic toxins with different removal kinetics: a novel approach based on intradialytic spent dialysate measurements.

Paats J, Adoberg A, Arund J, Dhondt A, Fernstrom A, Fridolin I Clin Kidney J. 2023; 16(4):735-744.

PMID: 37007697 PMC: 10061434. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfac273.


Does delivering more dialysis improve clinical outcomes? What randomized controlled trials have shown.

Deira J, Murea M, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Casino F, Basile C J Nephrol. 2022; 35(5):1315-1327.

PMID: 35041196 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-022-01246-8.


References
1.
Deira J, Suarez M, Lopez F, Garcia-Cabrera E, Gascon A, Torregrosa E . IHDIP: a controlled randomized trial to assess the security and effectiveness of the incremental hemodialysis in incident patients. BMC Nephrol. 2019; 20(1):8. PMC: 6325813. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-018-1189-6. View

2.
Kalantar-Zadeh K, Crowley S, Beddhu S, Chen J, Daugirdas J, Goldfarb D . Renal Replacement Therapy and Incremental Hemodialysis for Veterans with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease. Semin Dial. 2017; 30(3):251-261. PMC: 5418081. DOI: 10.1111/sdi.12601. View

3.
Teruel-Briones J, Fernandez-Lucas M, Rivera-Gorrin M, Ruiz-Roso G, Diaz-Dominguez M, Rodriguez-Mendiola N . Progression of residual renal function with an increase in dialysis: haemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis. Nefrologia. 2013; 33(5):640-9. DOI: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2013.May.12038. View

4.
Mathew A, Obi Y, Rhee C, Chen J, Shah G, Lau W . Treatment frequency and mortality among incident hemodialysis patients in the United States comparing incremental with standard and more frequent dialysis. Kidney Int. 2016; 90(5):1071-1079. DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.05.028. View

5.
Watson P, Watson I, Batt R . Total body water volumes for adult males and females estimated from simple anthropometric measurements. Am J Clin Nutr. 1980; 33(1):27-39. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/33.1.27. View