» Articles » PMID: 32072289

Differential Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Resection in Colon and Rectal Cancer Patients Aged 80 and Older: an Analysis of Nationwide Inpatient Sample

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2020 Feb 20
PMID 32072289
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Approximately, 22.6% of colorectal cancer surgeries were performed on patients aged 80 or over. The present study aimed to evaluate the use of laparoscopic resection and its short-term surgical outcomes in patients who were aged 80 and older and diagnosed with colon cancer or rectal cancer in parallel.

Methods: In this retrospective population-based study, colon and rectal cancer patients ≥ 80 years undergoing laparoscopic resection or open resection were identified from the United States National Inpatient Sample (2005-2014). Primary outcomes were postoperative complication and in-hospital mortality. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the short-term effectiveness of laparoscopic and open resection.

Results: In this study, 40,451 colon cancer patients and 1117 rectal cancer patients were included. Multivariate analysis revealed that laparoscopic resection was significantly associated with lower risks for developing postoperative complications (aOR = 0.67; 95%, CI 0.64-0.71) and in-hospital mortality (aOR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.32-0.43) compared to open resection in colon cancer patients. For rectal cancer patients, multivariate analysis indicated that laparoscopic resection was significantly associated with a lower risk of developing postoperative complications (aOR = 0.41; 95% CI 0.32-0.52) but was not associated with in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion: Compared to open resection, laparoscopic resection has better or similar short-term surgical outcomes in colon and rectal cancer patients ≥ 80 years.

Citing Articles

Risk factors for postoperative complications in laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery for octogenarians with colorectal cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.

Yamamoto T, Hida K, Goto K, Fukuda M, Inamoto S, Hashida H Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2025; 9(2):319-328.

PMID: 40046523 PMC: 11877346. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12874.


Clinical and economic effects of the transformation from an open to a laparoscopic center for colorectal surgery.

Zimmermann M, Abdalla T, Schluter K, Thomaschewski M, Keck T, Schloricke E Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025; 410(1):38.

PMID: 39810015 PMC: 11732922. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03590-8.


EAES/SAGES evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus on optimization of perioperative care in older adults.

Keller D, Curtis N, Burt H, Ammirati C, Collings A, Polk Jr H Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(8):4104-4126.

PMID: 38942944 PMC: 11289045. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10977-7.


The impact of surgical volume on outcomes in newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients receiving definitive surgeries.

Yeh C, Lai T, Hu Y, Teng C, Huang N, Liu C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):8227.

PMID: 38589462 PMC: 11001606. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55959-w.

References
1.
Villano A, Zeymo A, Houlihan B, Bayasi M, Al-Refaie W, Chan K . Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes. J Surg Res. 2019; 247:180-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.102. View

2.
Paschke S, Jafarov S, Staib L, Kreuser E, Maulbecker-Armstrong C, Roitman M . Are Colon and Rectal Cancer Two Different Tumor Entities? A Proposal to Abandon the Term Colorectal Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19(9). PMC: 6165083. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19092577. View

3.
Zhou X, Wang L, Shen W . Laparoscopic surgery as a treatment option for elderly patients with colon cancer. J BUON. 2017; 22(2):424-430. View