» Articles » PMID: 32070365

Is Patient-centred Care for Women a Priority for Policy-makers? Content Analysis of Government Policies

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2020 Feb 20
PMID 32070365
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Considerable research shows that women experience gendered disparities in healthcare access and quality. Patient-centred care (PCC) could reduce inequities by addressing the patient's clinical and personal needs. Healthcare policies can influence service delivery to optimise patient outcomes. This study assessed whether and how government policies recognise and promote PCC for women (PCCW).

Methods: We analysed the content of English-language policies published in Canada from 2010 to 2018 on depression and cardiac rehabilitation - conditions featuring known gendered inequities - that were identified on government websites. We extracted data and used summary statistics to enumerate mentions of PCC and women's health.

Results: We included 30 policies (20 depression, 10 cardiac rehabilitation). Of those, 20 (66.7%) included any content related to PCC (median 1.0, range 0.0 to 5.0), most often exchanging information (14, 46.7%) and making decisions (13, 43.3%). Less frequent domains were enabling self-management (8, 26.7%), addressing emotions (6, 20.0%) and fostering the relationship (4, 13.3%). No policies included content for the domain of managing uncertainty. A higher proportion of cardiac rehabilitation guidelines included PCC content. Among the 30 policies, 7 (23.3%) included content related to at least one women's health domain (median 0.0, range 0.0 to 3.0). Most frequently included were social determinants of health (4, 13.3%). Fewer policies mentioned any issues to consider for women (2, 28.6%), issues specific to subgroups of women (2, 28.6%) or distinguished care for women from men (2, 28.6%). No policies included mention of abuse or violence, or discrimination or stigma. The policies largely pertained to depression. Despite mention of PCC or women's health, policies offered brief, vague guidance on how to achieve PCCW; for example, "Patients value being involved in decision-making" and "Women want care that is collaborative, woman- and family-centered, and culturally sensitive."

Conclusions: Despite considerable evidence of need and international recommendations, most policies failed to recognise gendered disparities or promote PCC as a mitigating strategy. These identified gaps represent opportunities by which government policies could be developed or strengthened to support PCCW. Future research should investigate complementary strategies such as equipping policy-makers with the evidence and tools required to develop PCCW-informed policies.

Citing Articles

Barriers and facilitators to women's access to sexual and reproductive health services in rural Australia: a systematic review.

Wood S, Alston L, Chapman A, Lenehan J, Versace V BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1221.

PMID: 39394094 PMC: 11468210. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11710-9.


Caesarean section on maternal request: a qualitative study of conflicts related to shared decision-making and person-centred care in Sweden.

Fredriksson M, Holmstrom I, Hoglund A, Fleron E, Mattebo M Reprod Health. 2024; 21(1):97.

PMID: 38956635 PMC: 11221017. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-024-01831-z.


Policies in Canada fail to address disparities in access to person-centred osteoarthritis care: a content analysis.

Abbaticchio A, Theodorlis M, Marshall D, MacKay C, Borkhoff C, Hazlewood G BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):522.

PMID: 38664819 PMC: 11044343. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10966-5.


Strengthening woman-centred care for pregnant women with female genital mutilation in Australia: a qualitative muti-method study.

Turkmani S, Dawson A Front Glob Womens Health. 2024; 5:1248562.

PMID: 38304041 PMC: 10829091. DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1248562.


Person-centered care for diverse women: Narrative review of foundational research.

Dong K, Gagliardi A Womens Health (Lond). 2023; 19:17455057231192317.

PMID: 37596928 PMC: 10440084. DOI: 10.1177/17455057231192317.


References
1.
Elo S, Kyngas H . The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008; 62(1):107-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. View

2.
Themessl-Huber M, Lazenbatt A, Taylor J . Overcoming health inequalities: a participative evaluation framework fit for the task. J R Soc Promot Health. 2008; 128(3):117-22. DOI: 10.1177/1466424008089798. View

3.
Weisz D, Gusmano M, Rodwin V . Gender and the treatment of heart disease in older persons in the United States, France, and England: a comparative, population-based view of a clinical phenomenon. Gend Med. 2005; 1(1):29-40. DOI: 10.1016/s1550-8579(04)80008-1. View

4.
Salzberg C, Hayes S, McCarthy D, Radley D, Abrams M, Shah T . Health System Performance for the High-Need Patient: A Look at Access to Care and Patient Care Experiences. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016; 27:1-12. View

5.
Palencia L, Malmusi D, De Moortel D, Artazcoz L, Backhans M, Vanroelen C . The influence of gender equality policies on gender inequalities in health in Europe. Soc Sci Med. 2014; 117:25-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.018. View