» Articles » PMID: 32069973

An Empirical Study on the Benefits Equity of the Medical Security Policy: the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS)

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Feb 20
PMID 32069973
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One of the fundamental objectives of the basic medical security system is to provide institutional guarantees for the appropriate medical needs of different groups. Among them, achieving fairness of benefits is the first principle of the system. This study aims to explore the benefit equity of preventive health care for different groups and the specific path to promote fairness. Based on the 2015 CHNS survey data, through the theory construction of benefit fairness in the basic medical insurance and using the two-stage IV-Heckman model, the paper analyzes the benefit fairness of the basic medical insurance in urban and rural China. This study indicates that (1) the results of empirical and theoretical models are not consistent with the sample of the insured population. (2) As private medical insurance and medical assistance are restricted in the model, the reimbursement ratio of medical insurance in other income groups is all higher than the highest one. However, the coefficient is getting larger, with the lowest income group having the largest coefficient. After controlling for variables of disease and severity, the results suggest that the main impact path is hospitalization costs. (3) Taking the highest income group as a reference, the compensation proportion of preventive health care in other groups is higher, respectively, than the reference group, while the groups below middle income have a significant relationship with compensation for preventive health care. Supplementary private medical insurance and medical assistance have important protection functions for low- and middle-income populations. However, owing to the actual income threshold, the two groups cannot benefit from the medical security system. This result is still valid in the field of preventive health care. The increase of preventive health care expenditure reduces the cost of individual hospitalization, but the high-income group has emerged with more preventive health care expenditures, creating new unfairness.

Citing Articles

Benefit equity of social health insurance in China and its provinces (2014-2020): implications for universal health coverage.

Zhang Y, Mills A, Xu J BMJ Glob Health. 2024; 9(11).

PMID: 39496360 PMC: 11535667. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014806.


Inequality in benefit distribution of reducing the outpatient cost-sharing: evidence from the outpatient pooling scheme in China.

Zhang T, Chen M Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1357114.

PMID: 38500728 PMC: 10945005. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1357114.


Inpatients' Perception of Patient-Centered Care in Guangdong Province, China: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Zhou L, Xu R, Xu Y, Chang J, Wang D Inquiry. 2021; 58:469580211059482.

PMID: 34872361 PMC: 8655447. DOI: 10.1177/00469580211059482.


What Drives Outpatient Care Costs in Kenya? An Analysis With Generalized Estimating Equations.

Mwenda N, Nduati R, Kosgei M, Kerich G Front Public Health. 2021; 9:648465.

PMID: 34631637 PMC: 8492944. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.648465.


Outpatient Visits among Older Adults Living Alone in China: Does Health Insurance and City of Residence Matter?.

Wang J, Pei Y, Zhong R, Wu B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(12).

PMID: 32549227 PMC: 7344973. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17124256.

References
1.
Ranson M . Reduction of catastrophic health care expenditures by a community-based health insurance scheme in Gujarat, India: current experiences and challenges. Bull World Health Organ. 2002; 80(8):613-21. PMC: 2567585. View

2.
Abaluck J, Gruber J, Swanson A . Prescription Drug Use under Medicare Part D: A Linear Model of Nonlinear Budget Sets. J Public Econ. 2018; 164:106-138. PMC: 6292523. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.05.005. View

3.
Scanlon W . A theory of the nursing home market. Inquiry. 1980; 17(1):25-41. View

4.
Finkelstein A, Taubman S, Wright B, Bernstein M, Gruber J, Newhouse J . THE OREGON HEALTH INSURANCE EXPERIMENT: EVIDENCE FROM THE FIRST YEAR. Q J Econ. 2013; 127(3):1057-1106. PMC: 3535298. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjs020. View

5.
Getzen T . Health care is an individual necessity and a national luxury: applying multilevel decision models to the analysis of health care expenditures. J Health Econ. 2000; 19(2):259-70. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6296(99)00032-6. View