» Articles » PMID: 32069837

FDA and EMA Approvals of New Breast Cancer Drugs-A Comparative Regulatory Analysis

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Feb 20
PMID 32069837
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide and the solid tumor type for which the highest number of drugs have been approved to date. This study examines new drug approvals for breast cancer by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), based on an analysis of regulatory documents from both agencies for the period from 1995 to 2018. Of the 29 breast cancer drugs approved over this time span, 17 received positive decisions from both the FDA and EMA, including all drugs licensed after 2008. Nineteen of the 25 FDA-approved drugs, but none of the EMA approvals, benefited from special regulatory pathways (such as fast track, breakthrough therapy, or priority review). In the U.S.A., four accelerated approvals were granted (of which one, for bevacizumab, was later revoked), while only two drugs received provisional approvals following EMA review. New breast cancer drugs were approved approximately twelve months earlier in the United States than in Europe. These results suggest that a broader use of special regulatory pathways by EMA could help to accelerate access to novel drugs for European breast cancer patients.

Citing Articles

Failure to progress: breast and prostate cancer cell lines in developing targeted therapies.

James C, Whitehead A, Plummer J, Thompson R, Badal S Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2024; 43(4):1529-1548.

PMID: 39060878 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-024-10202-w.


Clinical development and marketing application review times for novel orphan-designated drugs.

Demirci E, Knicley J, Fiorentino L Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1404922.

PMID: 38903827 PMC: 11188924. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1404922.


USE OF ARTIFICIAL CELLS AS DRUG CARRIERS.

Diltemiz S, Tavafoghi PhD M, de Barros N, Kanada M, Heinamaki J, Contag C Mater Chem Front. 2024; 5(18):6672-6692.

PMID: 38344270 PMC: 10857888. DOI: 10.1039/d1qm00717c.


Evidence into practice: a national cohort study of NICE-recommended oncological drug therapy utilisation among women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in England.

Gannon M, Dodwell D, Aggarwal A, Park M, Miller K, Horgan K Br J Cancer. 2023; 129(10):1569-1579.

PMID: 37741900 PMC: 10646146. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02439-z.


Trends in endpoint use in pivotal trials and efficacy for US Food and Drug Administration-approved solid tumor therapies, 1995-2021.

Alabaku O, Laffey T, Suh K, Li M J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022; 28(11):1219-1223.

PMID: 36282934 PMC: 10372986. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.11.1219.


References
1.
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M . Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2014; 136(5):E359-86. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29210. View

2.
Kashoki M, Hanaizi Z, Yordanova S, Vesely R, Bouygues C, Llinares J . A Comparison of EMA and FDA Decisions for New Drug Marketing Applications 2014-2016: Concordance, Discordance, and Why. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019; 107(1):195-202. PMC: 6977394. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1565. View

3.
Downing N, Zhang A, Ross J . Regulatory Review of New Therapeutic Agents - FDA versus EMA, 2011-2015. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(14):1386-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1700103. View

4.
Sun J, Wei Q, Zhou Y, Wang J, Liu Q, Xu H . A systematic analysis of FDA-approved anticancer drugs. BMC Syst Biol. 2017; 11(Suppl 5):87. PMC: 5629554. DOI: 10.1186/s12918-017-0464-7. View

5.
Liberti L, Bujar M, Breckenridge A, Hoekman J, McAuslane N, Stolk P . FDA Facilitated Regulatory Pathways: Visualizing Their Characteristics, Development, and Authorization Timelines. Front Pharmacol. 2017; 8:161. PMC: 5376616. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00161. View