» Articles » PMID: 32068967

Assessing Neuron-Astrocyte Spatial Interactions Using the Neuron-Astrocyte Proximity Assay

Overview
Date 2020 Feb 19
PMID 32068967
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Astrocytes are morphologically complex cells with numerous close contacts with neurons at the level of their somata, branches, and branchlets. The smallest astrocyte processes make discrete contacts with synapses at scales that cannot be observed by standard light microscopy. At such contact points, astrocytes are thought to perform both homeostatic and neuromodulatory roles-functions that are proposed to be determined by their close spatial apposition. To study such spatial interactions, we previously developed a Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based approach, which enables observation and tracking of the static and dynamic proximity of astrocyte processes with synapses. The approach is compatible with standard imaging techniques such as confocal microscopy and permits assessment of the most proximate contacts between astrocytes and neurons in live tissues. In this protocol article we describe the approach to analyze the contacts between striatal astrocyte processes and corticostriatal neuronal projection terminals onto medium spiny neurons. We report the required protocols in detail, including adeno-associated virus microinjections, acute brain slice preparation, imaging, and post hoc FRET quantification. The article provides a detailed description that can be used to characterize and study astrocyte process proximity to synapses in living tissue. © 2020 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Basic Protocol 1: Förster resonance energy transfer imaging in cultured cells Basic Protocol 2: Förster resonance energy transfer imaging with the neuron-astrocyte proximity assay in acute brain slices.

Citing Articles

Activation of G Signaling in Cortical Astrocytes Does Not Influence Formation of a Persistent Contextual Memory Engram.

Mak A, Abramian A, Driessens S, Boers-Escuder C, van der Loo R, Smit A eNeuro. 2024; 11(6).

PMID: 38902023 PMC: 11209656. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0056-24.2024.


Characterization of Astrocyte Morphology and Function Using a Fast and Reliable Tissue Clearing Technique.

Aryal S, Neupane K, Masud A, Richards C Curr Protoc. 2021; 1(10):e279.

PMID: 34694747 PMC: 8550103. DOI: 10.1002/cpz1.279.


Interactions of neuroimmune signaling and glutamate plasticity in addiction.

Gipson C, Rawls S, Scofield M, Siemsen B, Bondy E, Maher E J Neuroinflammation. 2021; 18(1):56.

PMID: 33612110 PMC: 7897396. DOI: 10.1186/s12974-021-02072-8.

References
1.
Khakh B, Sofroniew M . Diversity of astrocyte functions and phenotypes in neural circuits. Nat Neurosci. 2015; 18(7):942-52. PMC: 5258184. DOI: 10.1038/nn.4043. View

2.
Zal T, Gascoigne N . Photobleaching-corrected FRET efficiency imaging of live cells. Biophys J. 2004; 86(6):3923-39. PMC: 1304294. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.103.022087. View

3.
Berney C, Danuser G . FRET or no FRET: a quantitative comparison. Biophys J. 2003; 84(6):3992-4010. PMC: 1302980. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75126-1. View

4.
Perez-Alvarez A, Navarrete M, Covelo A, Martin E, Araque A . Structural and functional plasticity of astrocyte processes and dendritic spine interactions. J Neurosci. 2014; 34(38):12738-44. PMC: 6705321. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2401-14.2014. View

5.
Bernardinelli Y, Randall J, Janett E, Nikonenko I, Konig S, Jones E . Activity-dependent structural plasticity of perisynaptic astrocytic domains promotes excitatory synapse stability. Curr Biol. 2014; 24(15):1679-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.025. View