» Articles » PMID: 32067120

Bromeliads Affect the Interactions and Composition of Invertebrates on Their Support Tree

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2020 Feb 19
PMID 32067120
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Individual species can have profound effects on ecological communities, but, in hyperdiverse systems, it can be challenging to determine the underlying ecological mechanisms. Simplifying species' responses by trophic level or functional group may be useful, but characterizing the trait structure of communities may be better related to niche processes. A largely overlooked trait in such community-level analyses is behaviour. In the Neotropics, epiphytic tank bromeliads (Bromeliaceae) harbour a distinct fauna of terrestrial invertebrates that is mainly composed of predators, such as ants and spiders. As these bromeliad-associated predators tend to forage on the bromeliads' support tree, they may influence the arboreal invertebrate fauna. We examined how, by increasing associated predator habitat, bromeliads may affect arboreal invertebrates. Specifically, we observed the trophic and functional group composition, and the behaviour and interspecific interactions of arboreal invertebrates in trees with and without bromeliads. Bromeliads modified the functional composition of arboreal invertebrates, but not the overall abundance of predators and herbivores. Bromeliads did not alter the overall behavioural profile of arboreal invertebrates, but did lead to more positive interactions in the day than at night, with a reverse pattern on trees without bromeliads. In particular, tending behaviours were influenced by bromeliad-associated predators. These results indicate that detailed examination of the functional affiliations and behaviour of organisms can reveal complex effects of habitat-forming species like bromeliads, even when total densities of trophic groups are insensitive.

Citing Articles

The Arrow Macambira (Encholirium spectabile: Bromeliaceae) as an Important Habitat for the Arthropod Fauna in Rocky Outcrops of the Brazilian Semi-Arid Region.

Jorge J, Santos R, de Sena Monte O, Freire E, Caliman A Neotrop Entomol. 2024; 53(3):568-577.

PMID: 38687426 DOI: 10.1007/s13744-024-01145-6.

References
1.
Ripple W, Estes J, Schmitz O, Constant V, Kaylor M, Lenz A . What is a Trophic Cascade?. Trends Ecol Evol. 2016; 31(11):842-849. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.08.010. View

2.
Wu X, Griffin J, Xi X, Sun S . The sign of cascading predator effects varies with prey traits in a detrital system. J Anim Ecol. 2015; 84(6):1610-7. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12403. View

3.
Nentwig W . Non-webbuilding spiders: prey specialists or generalists?. Oecologia. 2017; 69(4):571-576. DOI: 10.1007/BF00410365. View

4.
Thompson R, Hemberg M, Starzomski B, Shurin J . Trophic levels and trophic tangles: the prevalence of omnivory in real food webs. Ecology. 2007; 88(3):612-7. DOI: 10.1890/05-1454. View

5.
Touchton J, Smith J . Species loss, delayed numerical responses, and functional compensation in an antbird guild. Ecology. 2011; 92(5):1126-36. DOI: 10.1890/10-1458.1. View