» Articles » PMID: 32064272

Exceptional Enlargement of the Mitochondrial Genome Results from Distinct Causes in Different Rain Frogs (Anura: Brevicipitidae: )

Overview
Journal Int J Genomics
Publisher Wiley
Date 2020 Feb 18
PMID 32064272
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The mitochondrial (mt) genome of the bushveld rain frog (, Brevicipitidae, Afrobatrachia) is the largest (28.8 kbp) among the vertebrates investigated to date. The major cause of genome size enlargement in this species is the duplication of multiple genomic regions. To investigate the evolutionary lineage, timing, and process of mt genome enlargement, we sequenced the complete mtDNAs of two congeneric rain frogs, and . The mt genomic organization, gene content, and gene arrangements of these two rain frogs are very similar to each other but differ from those of . The mt genome (22.5 kbp) does not differ significantly from that of most other afrobatrachians. In contrast, the mtDNA (28.1 kbp) is considerably larger: currently the second largest among vertebrates, after The main causes of genome enlargement differ among species. Unusual elongation (12.5 kbp) of the control region (CR), a single major noncoding region of the vertebrate mt genome, is responsible for the extremely large mt genome in . Based on the current phylogeny and estimated divergence age, it can be concluded that the genome enlargements occurred independently in each species lineage within relatively short periods. Furthermore, a high nucleotide substitution rate and relaxation of selective pressures, which are considered to be involved in changes in genome size, were also detected in afrobatrachian lineages. Our results suggest that these factors were not direct causes but may have indirectly affected mt genome enlargements in .

Citing Articles

Evolution of myxozoan mitochondrial genomes: insights from myxobolids.

Sandberg T, Yahalomi D, Bracha N, Haddas-Sasson M, Pupko T, Atkinson S BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):388.

PMID: 38649808 PMC: 11034133. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10254-w.


Rapid and collective determination of the complete "hot-spring frog" mitochondrial genome containing long repeat regions using Nanopore sequencing.

Asaeda Y, Shiraga K, Suzuki M, Sambongi Y, Ogino H, Igawa T PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0280090.

PMID: 37906558 PMC: 10617713. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280090.


Mitochondrially mediated RNA interference, a retrograde signaling system affecting nuclear gene expression.

Plazzi F, Le Cras Y, Formaggioni A, Passamonti M Heredity (Edinb). 2023; 132(3):156-161.

PMID: 37714959 PMC: 10923801. DOI: 10.1038/s41437-023-00650-5.


The mitochondrial genome and phylogenetic analysis of Rhacophorus rhodopus.

Chen W, Qin H, Zhao Z, Liao J, Chen H, Jiang L Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):13693.

PMID: 35953583 PMC: 9372073. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17814-8.


Mitochondrial Genomic Landscape: A Portrait of the Mitochondrial Genome 40 Years after the First Complete Sequence.

Formaggioni A, Luchetti A, Plazzi F Life (Basel). 2021; 11(7).

PMID: 34357035 PMC: 8303319. DOI: 10.3390/life11070663.


References
1.
Moritz C, Brown W . Tandem duplications in animal mitochondrial DNAs: variation in incidence and gene content among lizards. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987; 84(20):7183-7. PMC: 299254. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.84.20.7183. View

2.
Boussau B, Brown J, Fujita M . Nonadaptive evolution of mitochondrial genome size. Evolution. 2011; 65(9):2706-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01322.x. View

3.
Kakehashi R, Kurabayashi A, Oumi S, Katsuren S, Hoso M, Sumida M . Mitochondrial genomes of Japanese Babina frogs (Ranidae, Anura): unique gene arrangements and the phylogenetic position of genus Babina. Genes Genet Syst. 2013; 88(1):59-67. DOI: 10.1266/ggs.88.59. View

4.
Yang Z . PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 2007; 24(8):1586-91. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm088. View

5.
Hou Y, Wu B, Liu Z, Yang A, Ren J, Zhou L . Complete mitochondrial genome of Ark shell Scapharca subcrenata. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2014; 27(2):939-40. DOI: 10.3109/19401736.2014.926495. View