» Articles » PMID: 32058331

Identification of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus by Disease-Specific Patterns of Brain Stiffness and Damping Ratio

Overview
Journal Invest Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2020 Feb 15
PMID 32058331
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to perform a whole-brain analysis of alterations in brain mechanical properties due to normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH).

Materials And Methods: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) examinations were performed on 85 participants, including 44 cognitively unimpaired controls, 33 with NPH, and 8 who were amyloid-positive with Alzheimer clinical syndrome. A custom neural network inversion was used to estimate stiffness and damping ratio from patches of displacement data, accounting for edges by training the network to estimate the mechanical properties in the presence of missing data. This learned inversion was first compared with a standard analytical approach in simulation experiments and then applied to the in vivo MRE measurements. The effect of NPH on the mechanical properties was then assessed by voxel-wise modeling of the stiffness and damping ratio maps. Finally, a pattern analysis was performed on each individual's mechanical property maps by computing the correlation between each person's maps with the expected NPH effect. These features were used to fit a classifier and assess diagnostic accuracy.

Results: The voxel-wise analysis of the in vivo mechanical property maps revealed a unique pattern in participants with NPH, including a concentric pattern of stiffening near the dural surface and softening near the ventricles, as well as decreased damping ratio predominantly in superior regions of the white matter (family-wise error corrected P < 0.05 at cluster level). The pattern of viscoelastic changes in each participant predicted NPH status in this cohort, separating participants with NPH from the control and the amyloid-positive with Alzheimer clinical syndrome groups, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.999 and 1, respectively.

Conclusions: This study provides motivation for further development of the neural network inversion framework and demonstrates the potential of MRE as a novel tool to diagnose NPH and provide a window into its pathogenesis.

Citing Articles

The contributions of relative brain viscosity to brain function and health.

McIlvain G Brain Commun. 2024; 6(6):fcae424.

PMID: 39713240 PMC: 11660954. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae424.


The Networking Brain: How Extracellular Matrix, Cellular Networks, and Vasculature Shape the In Vivo Mechanical Properties of the Brain.

Bergs J, Morr A, Silva R, Infante-Duarte C, Sack I Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(31):e2402338.

PMID: 38874205 PMC: 11336943. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202402338.


Biomechanical instability of the brain-CSF interface in hydrocephalus.

Duy P, Mehta N, Kahle K Brain. 2024; 147(10):3274-3285.

PMID: 38798141 PMC: 11449143. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awae155.


Viscoelastic polyacrylamide MR elastography phantoms with tunable damping ratio independent of shear stiffness.

Williams L, Cao Z, Lateef A, McGarry M, Corbin E, Johnson C J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2024; 154:106522.

PMID: 38537609 PMC: 11023745. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106522.


Association Between Anatomic and Clinical Indicators of Injury Severity After Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Study Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Esterov D, Yin Z, Persaud T, Shan X, Murphy M, Ehman R Neurotrauma Rep. 2024; 5(1):232-242.

PMID: 38524727 PMC: 10960168. DOI: 10.1089/neur.2023.0122.


References
1.
Savolainen S, Paljarvi L, Vapalahti M . Prevalence of Alzheimer's disease in patients investigated for presumed normal pressure hydrocephalus: a clinical and neuropathological study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1999; 141(8):849-53. DOI: 10.1007/s007010050386. View

2.
Fattahi N, Arani A, Perry A, Meyer F, Manduca A, Glaser K . MR Elastography Demonstrates Increased Brain Stiffness in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015; 37(3):462-7. PMC: 4792773. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4560. View

3.
Keong N, Pena A, Price S, Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z, Pickard J . Imaging normal pressure hydrocephalus: theories, techniques, and challenges. Neurosurg Focus. 2016; 41(3):E11. DOI: 10.3171/2016.7.FOCUS16194. View

4.
Murphy M, Huston 3rd J, Jack Jr C, Glaser K, Senjem M, Chen J . Measuring the characteristic topography of brain stiffness with magnetic resonance elastography. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e81668. PMC: 3847077. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081668. View

5.
Roberts R, Geda Y, Knopman D, Cha R, Pankratz V, Boeve B . The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging: design and sampling, participation, baseline measures and sample characteristics. Neuroepidemiology. 2008; 30(1):58-69. PMC: 2821441. DOI: 10.1159/000115751. View