» Articles » PMID: 32055199

Effect of Varying Proportions of Lignin and Cellulose Supplements on Immune Function and Lymphoid Organs of Layer Poultry ()

Overview
Journal J Poult Sci
Date 2020 Feb 15
PMID 32055199
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To determine the benefits of different types or proportions of insoluble fiber components on growth and immunity, 4-week-old commercial layer pullets were fed supplements containing different proportions of purified lignin and cellulose or a commercial lignocellulose supplement. The 64 Hy-Line Brown pullets were provided basal diets supplemented with 1 g fiber per 100 g diet. The supplements included a commercial lignocellulose, Arbocel RC fine (group A) with cellulose to lignin ratio of approximately 3:1, cellulose (group Ce), a 3:1 mixture of cellulose: lignin (group Ce3Lig1), and a 2:1 mixture of cellulose: lignin (group Ce2Lig1). After 3 weeks, innate immune function was measured in terms of heterophil phagocytosis and oxidative burst (=8). After 4 weeks, stimulated lymphocyte proliferation was determined for assessment of cell-mediated immune function (=7). All pullets were killed at 9 weeks of age and lymphoid organs were weighed (=16) and small intestinal Peyer's patches (PP) were measured (=8). Pullets in both A and Ce3Lig1 groups had heavier (<0.05) body and bursa of Fabricius weights. The number of PP in group A was higher (<0.05) than in group Ce. The percentage of heterophil phagocytosis in A and Ce3Lig1 groups were higher (<0.05) than in group Ce, and oxidative burst of group A was higher (<0.05) than that of group Ce. Addition of 1% Arbocel or 1% Ce3Lig1 to the diet of layer pullets from 4 to 9 weeks of age significantly improved their growth and innate immune function compared to group Ce. This suggests that lignin either modulates the effect of cellulose or has specific mechanisms of action in the gut that improves growth and immunity. The proportion of lignin to cellulose may also be important for growth and immune function.

Citing Articles

Effects of the Addition of Crude Fibre Concentrate on Performance, Welfare and Selected Caecal Bacteria of Broilers.

Urban J, Jaworski S, Lange A, Bien D, Matuszewski A, Michalczuk M Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(24).

PMID: 38136920 PMC: 10741125. DOI: 10.3390/ani13243883.


Holistic Strategies to Control Infantis: An Emerging Challenge in the European Broiler Sector.

Montoro-Dasi L, Lorenzo-Rebenaque L, Marco-Fuertes A, Vega S, Marin C Microorganisms. 2023; 11(7).

PMID: 37512937 PMC: 10386103. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11071765.


Dietary fiber in poultry nutrition and their effects on nutrient utilization, performance, gut health, and on the environment: a review.

Jha R, Mishra P J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2021; 12(1):51.

PMID: 33866972 PMC: 8054369. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-021-00576-0.

References
1.
Revajova V, Levkut M, Levkutova M, Borutova R, Gresakova L, Kosikova B . Effect of lignin supplementation of a diet contaminated with Fusarium mycotoxins on blood and intestinal lymphocyte subpopulations in chickens. Acta Vet Hung. 2013; 61(3):354-65. DOI: 10.1556/AVet.2013.023. View

2.
Palacios M, Cunnick J, Winkler D, Vleck C . Immunosenescence in some but not all immune components in a free-living vertebrate, the tree swallow. Proc Biol Sci. 2007; 274(1612):951-7. PMC: 2141670. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0192. View

3.
Hussein S, Yokhana J, Frankel T . Supplementing the feeds of layer pullets, at different ages with two different fiber sources improves immune function. Poult Sci. 2017; 96(8):2718-2727. PMC: 7112000. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pex051. View

4.
Rodriguez-Mendez A, Luna-Acosta J, Carranza M, Harvey S, Aramburo C, Luna M . Growth hormone expression in stromal and non-stromal cells in the bursa of Fabricius during bursal development and involution: Causal relationships?. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010; 167(2):297-307. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2010.03.019. View

5.
Cornes J . Number, size, and distribution of Peyer's patches in the human small intestine: Part I The development of Peyer's patches. Gut. 1965; 6(3):225-9. PMC: 1552287. DOI: 10.1136/gut.6.3.225. View