» Articles » PMID: 32047408

Improving Grazing-incidence Small-angle X-ray Scattering-computed Tomography Images by Total Variation Minimization

Overview
Date 2020 Feb 13
PMID 32047408
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Grazing-incidence small-angle X-ray scattering (GISAXS) coupled with computed tomography (CT) has enabled the visualization of the spatial distribution of nanostructures in thin films. 2D GISAXS images are obtained by scanning along the direction perpendicular to the X-ray beam at each rotation angle. Because the intensities at the positions contain nanostructural information, the reconstructed CT images individually represent the spatial distributions of this information ( size, shape, surface, characteristic length). These images are reconstructed from the intensities acquired at angular intervals over 180°, but the total measurement time is prolonged. This increase in the radiation dosage can cause damage to the sample. One way to reduce the overall measurement time is to perform a scanning GISAXS measurement along the direction perpendicular to the X-ray beam with a limited interval angle. Using filtered back-projection (FBP), CT images are reconstructed from sinograms with limited interval angles from 3 to 48° (FBP-CT images). However, these images are blurred and have a low image quality. In this study, to optimize the CT image quality, total variation (TV) regularization is introduced to minimize sinogram image noise and artifacts. It is proposed that the TV method can be applied to downsampling of sinograms in order to improve the CT images in comparison with the FBP-CT images.

Citing Articles

Recent developments in X-ray diffraction/scattering computed tomography for materials science.

Omori N, Bobitan A, Vamvakeros A, Beale A, Jacques S Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023; 381(2259):20220350.

PMID: 37691470 PMC: 10493554. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2022.0350.


Grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction tomography for characterizing organic thin films.

Tsai E, Xia Y, Fukuto M, Loo Y, Li R J Appl Crystallogr. 2021; 54(Pt 5):1327-1339.

PMID: 34667445 PMC: 8493617. DOI: 10.1107/S1600576721007184.

References
1.
Elbakri I, Fessler J . Statistical image reconstruction for polyenergetic X-ray computed tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002; 21(2):89-99. DOI: 10.1109/42.993128. View

2.
Liebi M, Georgiadis M, Kohlbrecher J, Holler M, Raabe J, Usov I . Small-angle X-ray scattering tensor tomography: model of the three-dimensional reciprocal-space map, reconstruction algorithm and angular sampling requirements. Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv. 2017; 74(Pt 1):12-24. PMC: 5740453. DOI: 10.1107/S205327331701614X. View

3.
Kuhlmann M, Feldkamp J, Patommel J, Roth S, Timmann A, Gehrke R . Grazing incidence small-angle X-ray scattering microtomography demonstrated on a self-ordered dried drop of nanoparticles. Langmuir. 2009; 25(13):7241-3. DOI: 10.1021/la901325y. View

4.
Schaff F, Bech M, Zaslansky P, Jud C, Liebi M, Guizar-Sicairos M . Six-dimensional real and reciprocal space small-angle X-ray scattering tomography. Nature. 2015; 527(7578):353-6. DOI: 10.1038/nature16060. View

5.
Hudson H, Larkin R . Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994; 13(4):601-9. DOI: 10.1109/42.363108. View