» Articles » PMID: 32043457

Comparison of Face Washing and Face Wiping Methods for Trachoma Control: A Pilot Study

Abstract

Eye-to-eye transmission of , the causative agent of trachoma, may be plausibly interrupted if faces are kept free of ocular and nasal discharge. Between April and June 2018, 83 children aged 1-9 years with active trachoma were recruited from 62 households and allocated to a face cleaning protocol: face washing with water, face washing with water and soap, or face wiping. Faces were examined for the presence of ocular and nasal discharge, and swabs were taken from faces and hands to test for at baseline, immediately post protocol, and after 1, 2, and 4 hours (washing protocols). Washing with soap was more effective at removing ocular discharge than either washing with water (89% and 27% of discharge removed, respectively, = 0.003) or wiping with a hand (42%, = 0.013). The reduction in prevalence of ocular discharge was sustained for at least four hours. The prevalence of on face swabs was reduced by all washing protocols. The importance of soap should not be overlooked during facial cleanliness promotion.

Citing Articles

Distribution and viability of ocular and non-ocular Chlamydia trachomatis in households in a trachoma-endemic community in Oromia, Ethiopia.

Shafi Abdurahman O, Bekele G, Butcher R, Deressa G, Mumme A, Mohammed M PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025; 19(1):e0012759.

PMID: 39804825 PMC: 11729945. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012759.


Cluster randomised controlled trial of double-dose azithromycin mass drug administration, facial cleanliness and fly control measures for trachoma control in Oromia, Ethiopia: the stronger SAFE trial protocol.

Last A, Shafi Abdurahman O, Greenland K, Robinson A, Collin C, Czerniewska A BMJ Open. 2024; 14(12):e084478.

PMID: 39719287 PMC: 11751794. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084478.


Comparison of metrics for assessing face washing behaviour for trachoma control.

Greenland K, Collin C, Etu E, Guye M, Hika D, Macleod D PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024; 18(8):e0012399.

PMID: 39141680 PMC: 11346966. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012399.


Eliminating Trachoma in Africa: The Importance of Environmental Interventions.

Ageed A, Khan M Cureus. 2024; 16(1):e52358.

PMID: 38234389 PMC: 10792353. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52358.


Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Hygiene and the Prevention of Trachoma in the Indigenous Population of the Colombian Amazon Vaupés Department.

Trujillo-Trujillo J, Meza-Cardenas M, Sanchez S, Zamora S, Porras A, Lopez de Mesa C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(5).

PMID: 36901643 PMC: 10001660. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20054632.


References
1.
Ejere H, Alhassan M, Rabiu M . Face washing promotion for preventing active trachoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (2):CD003659. PMC: 4441394. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003659.pub4. View

2.
Stocks M, Ogden S, Haddad D, Addiss D, McGuire C, Freeman M . Effect of water, sanitation, and hygiene on the prevention of trachoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2014; 11(2):e1001605. PMC: 3934994. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001605. View

3.
Ramadhani A, Derrick T, Macleod D, Holland M, Burton M . The Relationship between Active Trachoma and Ocular Chlamydia trachomatis Infection before and after Mass Antibiotic Treatment. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016; 10(10):e0005080. PMC: 5082620. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005080. View

4.
Gower E, Solomon A, Burton M, Aguirre A, Munoz B, Bailey R . Chlamydial positivity of nasal discharge at baseline is associated with ocular chlamydial positivity 2 months following azithromycin treatment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47(11):4767-71. PMC: 6858273. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-1599. View

5.
. WHO simplified trachoma grading system. Community Eye Health. 2007; 17(52):68. PMC: 1705737. View