» Articles » PMID: 32042927

Survey on ART and IUI: Legislation, Regulation, Funding and Registries in European Countries: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)

Overview
Journal Hum Reprod Open
Date 2020 Feb 12
PMID 32042927
Citations 103
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Question: How are ART and IUI regulated, funded and registered in European countries?

Summary Answer: Of the 43 countries performing ART and IUI in Europe, and participating in the survey, specific legislation exists in only 39 countries, public funding (also available in the 39 countries) varies across and sometimes within countries and national registries are in place in 31 countries.

What Is Known Already: Some information devoted to particular aspects of accessibility to ART and IUI is available, but most is fragmentary or out-dated. Annual reports from the European IVF-Monitoring (EIM) Consortium for ESHRE clearly mirror different approaches in European countries regarding accessibility to and efficacy of those techniques.

Study Design Size Duration: A survey was designed using the online SurveyMonkey tool consisting of 55 questions concerning three domains-legal, funding and registry. Answers refer to the countries' situation on 31 December 2018.

Participants/materials Settings Methods: All members of EIM plus representatives of countries not yet members of the Consortium were invited to participate. Answers received were checked, and initial responders were asked to address unclear answers and to provide any additional information they considered important. Tables of individual countries resulting from the consolidated data were then sent to members of the Committee of National Representatives of ESHRE, asking for a second check. Conflicting information was clarified by direct contact.

Main Results And The Role Of Chance: Information was received from 43 out of the 44 European countries where ART and IUI are performed. Thirty-nine countries reported specific legislation on ART, and artificial insemination was considered an ART technique in 35 of them. Accessibility is limited to infertile couples in 11 of the 43 countries. A total of 30 countries offer treatments to single women and 18 to female couples. In five countries ART and IUI are permitted for treatment of all patient groups, being infertile couples, single women and same sex couples, male and female. Use of donated sperm is allowed in 41 countries, egg donation in 38, the simultaneous donation of sperm and egg in 32 and embryo donation in 29. Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for monogenic disorders or structural rearrangements is not allowed in two countries, and PGT for aneuploidy is not allowed in 11; surrogacy is accepted in 16 countries. With the exception of marital/sexual situation, female age is the most frequently reported limiting criteria for legal access to ART-minimal age is usually set at.

Limitations Reasons For Caution: The responses were provided by well-informed and committed individuals and submitted to double checking. Since no formal validation was in place, possible inaccuracies cannot be excluded. Also, results are a cross section in time and ART and IUI legislations within European countries undergo continuous evolution. Finally, several domains of ART activity were deliberately left out of the scope of this ESHRE survey.

Wider Implications Of The Findings: Results of this survey offer a detailed view of the ART and IUI situation in European countries. It provides updated and extensive answers to many relevant questions related to ART usage at national level and could be used by institutions and policymakers in planning services at both national and European levels.

Study Funding/competing Interests: The study has no external funding, and all costs were covered by ESHRE. There were no competing interests.ESHRE Pages are not externally peer reviewed. This article has been approved by the Executive Committee of ESHRE.

Citing Articles

Causes of embryo implantation failure: A systematic review and metaanalysis of procedures to increase embryo implantation potential.

Bulletti F, Sciorio R, Conforti A, De Luca R, Bulletti C, Palagiano A Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 15:1429193.

PMID: 40028443 PMC: 11867936. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1429193.


Risk of Thrombosis in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Narrative Review.

Grandone E, Bitsadze V, Khizroeva J, Chinni E, Mastroianno M, Nappi L J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004587 PMC: 11856335. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041053.


Comparison of the perinatal outcomes of live-born singletons between blastocysts and cleavage-stage embryo transfer in FET cycles via propensity score matching.

Zeng Y, Chen J, Zhang H, Nie X, Tan Y, Yin Y BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):200.

PMID: 39994607 PMC: 11852848. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-025-07347-z.


Financial cost of assisted reproductive technology for patients in high-income countries: A systematic review protocol.

Njagi P, Groot W, Arsenijevic J, Mburu G, Chambers G, Calhaz-Jorge C PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318780.

PMID: 39946323 PMC: 11825044. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318780.


Trends in clinical encounters and management for infertility among women attending Australian general practice: a national longitudinal study using MedicineInsight, 2011 to 2021.

Fernandez R, Moore V, Boyle J, Rumbold A, Davies M, Mazza D BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e085149.

PMID: 39894533 PMC: 11795361. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085149.


References
1.
Shenfield F, de Mouzon J, Scaravelli G, Kupka M, Ferraretti A, Prados F . Oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in European countries: statutory background, practice, storage and use. Hum Reprod Open. 2019; 2017(1):hox003. PMC: 6276651. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hox003. View

2.
De Geyter C, Wyns C, Mocanu E, de Mouzon J, Calhaz-Jorge C . Data collection systems in ART must follow the pace of change in clinical practice. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(10):2160-3. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew199. View

3.
Berg Brigham K, Cadier B, Chevreul K . The diversity of regulation and public financing of IVF in Europe and its impact on utilization. Hum Reprod. 2012; 28(3):666-75. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des418. View

4.
Shenfield F, de Mouzon J, Pennings G, Ferraretti A, Nyboe Andersen A, De Wert G . Cross border reproductive care in six European countries. Hum Reprod. 2010; 25(6):1361-8. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq057. View

5.
Nygren K, Adamson D, Zegers-Hochschild F, de Mouzon J . Cross-border fertility care--International Committee Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies global survey: 2006 data and estimates. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94(1):e4-e10. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.049. View