» Articles » PMID: 32042858

Deep Convolutional Neural Networks in the Classification of Dual-energy Thoracic Radiographic Views for Efficient Workflow: Analysis on over 6500 Clinical Radiographs

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2020 Feb 12
PMID 32042858
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

DICOM header information is frequently used to classify medical image types; however, if a header is missing fields or contains incorrect data, the utility is limited. To expedite image classification, we trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in two classification tasks for thoracic radiographic views obtained from dual-energy studies: (a) distinguishing between frontal, lateral, soft tissue, and bone images and (b) distinguishing between posteroanterior (PA) or anteroposterior (AP) chest radiographs. CNNs with AlexNet architecture were trained from scratch. 1910 manually classified radiographs were used for training the network to accomplish task (a), then tested with an independent test set (3757 images). Frontal radiographs from the two datasets were combined to train a network to accomplish task (b); tested using an independent test set of 1000 radiographs. ROC analysis was performed for each trained CNN with area under the curve (AUC) as a performance metric. Classification between frontal images (AP/PA) and other image types yielded an AUC of 0.997 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.996, 0.998]. Classification between PA and AP radiographs resulted in an AUC of 0.973 (95% CI: 0.961, 0.981). CNNs were able to rapidly classify thoracic radiographs with high accuracy, thus potentially contributing to effective and efficient workflow.

Citing Articles

Machine Learning Augmented Interpretation of Chest X-rays: A Systematic Review.

Ahmad H, Milne M, Buchlak Q, Ektas N, Sanderson G, Chamtie H Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 36832231 PMC: 9955112. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040743.


Toward understanding deep learning classification of anatomic sites: lessons from the development of a CBCT projection classifier.

Cruz-Bastida J, Pearson E, Al-Hallaq H J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2022; 9(4):045002.

PMID: 35903414 PMC: 9311487. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.9.4.045002.

References
1.
Metz C . Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med. 1978; 8(4):283-98. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2998(78)80014-2. View

2.
Rajkomar A, Lingam S, Taylor A, Blum M, Mongan J . High-Throughput Classification of Radiographs Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. J Digit Imaging. 2016; 30(1):95-101. PMC: 5267603. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-016-9914-9. View

3.
Giger M . Machine Learning in Medical Imaging. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018; 15(3 Pt B):512-520. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.12.028. View

4.
DeLong E, Delong D, Clarke-Pearson D . Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988; 44(3):837-45. View