» Articles » PMID: 32040461

Estimation of the Age of Majority Through Radiographic Evaluation of the Third Molar Maturation Degree

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2020 Feb 11
PMID 32040461
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although the third molar is the tooth with the greatest anatomical and developmental variability, some authors consider it important to estimate whether a subject is of legal age or not. The Demirjian's technique is the most widely used tool to estimate dental age and was therefore used in our study to assess possible correlation between the age of majority and the maturational degree of the lower third molars, evaluated through radiographic images.

Material And Methods: This observational transversal study was conducted on 180 panoramic radiographs from consecutive patients. The degree of maturation of the lower third molar was independently classified by two observers, according to the Demirjian´s maturational stage method.

Results: A total of 180 patients - 65 men (36.12%) and 115 women (63.88%) - were included (mean age 21.6 years; standard deviation 5.2). The age range of our subjects corresponded to maturational stages D to H in the Demirjian's classification. A logistic regression analysis showed that subjects classified into the highest maturational stage H had a significantly higher probability of being considered of legal age by both observers, as compared with subjects in the lowest stage D. Inter-observer agreement was very high. Gender predictive capacity was not observed.

Conclusions: Our results showed that subjects with the lower third molars in the highest maturational stage could be estimated to be older than 18 years and therefore considered of legal age, a finding also reported by other authorsThe Demirjian´s tooth maturational stage method, applied to the lower third molars, can be reliably used to estimate whether an individual is of legal age (18 years or older). High concordance between different observers using this method can be expected.

Citing Articles

Demirjian and Cameriere methods for age estimation in a Spanish sample of 1386 living subjects.

Melo M, Ata-Ali F, Ata-Ali J, Martinez Gonzalez J, Cobo T Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):2838.

PMID: 35181746 PMC: 8857188. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06917-x.


Legal age determined by a new threshold value of third molar maturity index in subjects with impacted mandibular third molars: An orthopantomographic study in south Indian adolescents.

Balla S, Nambi N, Nambi S, Chinnala B, Bojji M, Mula A Int J Legal Med. 2021; 136(1):251-259.

PMID: 34633500 DOI: 10.1007/s00414-021-02715-8.


Comparison of two established 2D staging techniques to their appliance in 3D cone beam computer-tomography for dental age estimation.

Zirk M, Zoeller J, Lentzen M, Bergeest L, Buller J, Zinser M Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):9024.

PMID: 33907220 PMC: 8079438. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88379-1.

References
1.
Kasper K, Austin D, Kvanli A, Rios T, Senn D . Reliability of third molar development for age estimation in a Texas Hispanic population: a comparison study. J Forensic Sci. 2009; 54(3):651-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01031.x. View

2.
Johan N, Khamis M, Abdul Jamal N, Ahmad B, Mahanani E . The variability of lower third molar development in Northeast Malaysian population with application to age estimation. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2012; 30(1):45-54. PMC: 5734847. View

3.
Hermetet C, Saint-Martin P, Gambier A, Ribier L, Sautenet B, Rerolle C . Forensic age estimation using computed tomography of the medial clavicular epiphysis: a systematic review. Int J Legal Med. 2018; 132(5):1415-1425. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-018-1847-z. View

4.
Liversidge H, Peariasamy K, Folayan M, Adeniyi A, Ngom P, Mikami Y . A radiographic study of the mandibular third molar root development in different ethnic groups. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2018; 35(2):97-108. PMC: 6100223. View

5.
Sisman Y, Uysal T, Yagmur F, Ramoglu S . Third-molar development in relation to chronologic age in Turkish children and young adults. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77(6):1040-5. DOI: 10.2319/101906-430.1. View