» Articles » PMID: 32039879

Efficacy of Coupling Intermittent Theta-burst Stimulation and 1 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Enhance Upper Limb Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Neurology
Date 2020 Feb 11
PMID 32039879
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Both 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) are reported to benefit upper limb motor function rehabilitation in patients with stroke. However, the efficacy of combining 1 Hz rTMS and iTBS has not been adequately explored.

Objective: We aimed to compare the effects of 1 Hz rTMS and the combination of 1 Hz rTMS and iTBS on the upper limb motor function in the subacute phase post-stroke.

Methods: Twenty-eight participants were randomly assigned to three groups: Group A (1 Hz rTMS over the contralesional primary motor cortex (M1) and iTBS over the ipsilesional M1), Group B (contralesional 1 Hz rTMS and ipsilesional sham iTBS), and Group C (contralesional sham 1 Hz rTMS and ipsilesional sham iTBS). The participants received the same conventional rehabilitation accompanied by sessions of transcranial magnetic stimulation for two weeks (5 days one week). Motor-evoked potential (MEP), upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA), and Barthel Index (BI) were performed before and after the sessions.

Results: Group A showed greater UE-FMA, BI, and MEP amplitude improvement and more significant decrement in MEP latency compared to Group B and Group C in testable patients. Correlation analyses in Group A revealed a close relation between ipsilesional MEP amplitude increment and UE-FMA gain.

Conclusions: The combining of 1 Hz rTMS and iTBS protocol in the present study is tolerable and more beneficial for motor improvement than the single use of 1 Hz rTMS in patients with subacute stroke.

Citing Articles

Global research hotspots and trends of theta burst stimulation from 2004 to 2023: a bibliometric analysis.

Liu M, Jin S, Liu M, Yang B, Wang Q, Fan C Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1469877.

PMID: 39719979 PMC: 11666417. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1469877.


Effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation on upper limb function in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lu J, Huang J, Ye A, Xie C, Bu P, Kang J Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1450435.

PMID: 39463790 PMC: 11505115. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1450435.


Comparative efficacy of different noninvasive brain stimulation protocols on upper-extremity motor function and activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Li L, Wu J, Li K, Jin J, Xiang Y, Hua X Neurol Sci. 2024; 45(8):3641-3681.

PMID: 38520639 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07437-4.


Theta burst stimulation: what role does it play in stroke rehabilitation? A systematic review of the existing evidence.

Jiang T, Wei X, Wang M, Xu J, Xia N, Lu M BMC Neurol. 2024; 24(1):52.

PMID: 38297193 PMC: 10832248. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03492-0.


EEG microstates analysis after TMS in patients with subacute stroke during the resting state.

Zhang H, Yang X, Yao L, Liu Q, Lu Y, Chen X Cereb Cortex. 2023; 34(1).

PMID: 38112223 PMC: 10793572. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhad480.