» Articles » PMID: 32038424

A Critical Review of Smart Residential Environments for Older Adults With a Focus on Pleasurable Experience

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2020 Feb 11
PMID 32038424
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Various smart services and technologies have been developed to support older adults' well-ness, make their daily tasks easier, and enhance their overall quality of life. When people grow older, older adults inevitably experience a significant decrease in their physical, cognitive, and sensory capabilities, which makes them develop negative attitudes toward technology. In this regard, this study highlights that older adults require not only usable and practical spaces but also smart residential environments that can fulfill them emotionally. Research on smart environments for this population should consider the hedonic and experiential factors of interacting with technology, such as fun, fulfillment, play, and user engagement. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of smart residential environments to support positive aging and pleasurable user experience in the architecture domain. For this critical review emphasizing the pleasurable smart environment, an evaluation framework was developed, consisting of four categories: well-ness, independence, acceptance, and design. Through an extensive analysis of selected papers in the architecture domain, it was found that studies on the smart home tend to focus on utilitarian factors, such as usability, monitoring physical experiences, and simulating energy efficiency, and rarely mention psychological well-ness. Smart environments should be designed to not only emphasize efficiency, effectiveness, and satisfaction but also to engage older adults and provide them positive experiences. As various smart technologies continue to evolve and integrate into smart living spaces, it is important to understand older adults' cognitive and emotional aspects and make the smart environment a more comfortable place for them.

Citing Articles

On the Necessity of Multidisciplinarity in the Development of at-Home Health Monitoring Platforms for Older Adults: Systematic Review.

Lochhead C, Fisher R JMIR Hum Factors. 2025; 12:e59458.

PMID: 40014832 PMC: 11884709. DOI: 10.2196/59458.


Perceptions and experiences of Korean American older adults with companion robots through long-term use: a comparative analysis of robot retention vs. return.

Lee O, Yun J, Park D Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1424123.

PMID: 39624414 PMC: 11609076. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1424123.


Optimizing Older Adult Mental Health in Support of Healthy Ageing: A Pluralistic Framework to Inform Transformative Change across Community and Healthcare Domains.

Horgan S, Prorok J, Ellis K, Mullaly L, Cassidy K, Seitz D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(6).

PMID: 38928911 PMC: 11203904. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21060664.


Scoping Review of Technological Solutions for Community Dwelling Older Adults and Implications for Instrumental Activities of Daily Living.

Arioz U, Smrke U, Plohl N, Spes T, Musil B, Mlakar I Aging Dis. 2024; .

PMID: 38421834 PMC: 11745446. DOI: 10.14336/AD.2024.0215.


Benefits and barriers associated with the use of smart home health technologies in the care of older persons: a systematic review.

Tian Y, Felber N, Pageau F, Schwab D, Wangmo T BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):152.

PMID: 38355464 PMC: 10865618. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04702-1.


References
1.
Demiris G, Parker Oliver D, Giger J, Skubic M, Rantz M . Older adults' privacy considerations for vision based recognition methods of eldercare applications. Technol Health Care. 2009; 17(1):41-8. DOI: 10.3233/THC-2009-0530. View

2.
Demiris G, Hensel B . Technologies for an aging society: a systematic review of "smart home" applications. Yearb Med Inform. 2008; :33-40. View

3.
Miller D, Bruce H, Gagnon M, Talbot V, Messier C . Improving older adults' experience with interactive voice response systems. Telemed J E Health. 2011; 17(6):452-5. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0204. View

4.
Eckert J, Morgan L, Swamy N . Preferences for receipt of care among community-dwelling adults. J Aging Soc Policy. 2004; 16(2):49-65. DOI: 10.1300/J031v16n02_04. View

5.
Forster A, van Walraven C . Using an interactive voice response system to improve patient safety following hospital discharge. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007; 13(3):346-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00702.x. View