» Articles » PMID: 32036798

The Impact of an Electronic Medical Record Nudge on Reducing Testing for Hospital-onset Infection

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of an electronic medical record (EMR) nudge at reducing total and inappropriate orders testing for hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile infection (HO-CDI).

Design: An interrupted time series analysis of HO-CDI orders 2 years before and 2 years after the implementation of an EMR intervention designed to reduce inappropriate HO-CDI testing. Orders for C. difficile testing were considered inappropriate if the patient had received a laxative or stool softener in the previous 24 hours.

Setting: Four hospitals in an academic healthcare network.

Patients: All patients with a C. difficile order after hospital day 3.

Intervention: Orders for C. difficile testing in patients administered a laxative or stool softener in <24 hours triggered an EMR alert defaulting to cancellation of the order ("nudge").

Results: Of the 17,694 HO-CDI orders, 7% were inappropriate (8% prentervention vs 6% postintervention; P < .001). Monthly HO-CDI orders decreased by 21% postintervention (level-change rate ratio [RR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.86), and the rate continued to decrease (postintervention trend change RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-1.00). The intervention was not associated with a level change in inappropriate HO-CDI orders (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.61-1.05), but the postintervention inappropriate order rate decreased over time (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.97).

Conclusion: An EMR nudge to minimize inappropriate ordering for C. difficile was effective at reducing HO-CDI orders, and likely contributed to decreasing the inappropriate HO-CDI order rate after the intervention.

Citing Articles

Clinical decision support for gastrointestinal panel testing.

Saif N, Dooley C, Baghdadi J, Morgan D, Coffey K Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024; 4(1):e22.

PMID: 38415090 PMC: 10897720. DOI: 10.1017/ash.2024.15.


Diagnostic stewardship to limit repeat plasma cytomegalovirus viral load testing.

Trirattanapikul A, Pasomsub E, Siriyotha S, Pattanaprateep O, Phuphuakrat A BMC Infect Dis. 2023; 23(1):387.

PMID: 37296377 PMC: 10251324. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08355-0.


Reductions in inpatient fluoroquinolone use and postdischarge infection (CDI) from a systemwide antimicrobial stewardship intervention.

Ashley Jones K, Onwubiko U, Kubes J, Albrecht B, Paciullo K, Howard-Anderson J Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022; 1(1):e32.

PMID: 36168449 PMC: 9495417. DOI: 10.1017/ash.2021.197.


Implementation and Evaluation of Two Nudges in a Hospital's Electronic Prescribing System to Optimise Cost-Effective Prescribing.

Khanal S, Schmidtke K, Talat U, Sarwar A, Vlaev I Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(7).

PMID: 35885760 PMC: 9316495. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10071233.


A Baker's Dozen of Top Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention Publications in 2020.

Green S, Stover K, Barber K, Bouchard J, Brown M, Deri C Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021; 8(9):ofab422.

PMID: 34557559 PMC: 8454524. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab422.

References
1.
Sunstein C . Nudging smokers. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(22):2150-1. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe1503200. View

2.
Dubberke E, Han Z, Bobo L, Hink T, Lawrence B, Copper S . Impact of clinical symptoms on interpretation of diagnostic assays for Clostridium difficile infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2011; 49(8):2887-93. PMC: 3147743. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00891-11. View

3.
White D, Hamilton K, Pegues D, Hanish A, Umscheid C . The Impact of a Computerized Clinical Decision Support Tool on Inappropriate Clostridium difficile Testing. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017; 38(10):1204-1208. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2017.161. View

4.
Caris M, Labuschagne H, Dekker M, Kramer M, van Agtmael M, Vandenbroucke-Grauls C . Nudging to improve hand hygiene. J Hosp Infect. 2017; 98(4):352-358. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.023. View

5.
Zacharioudakis I, Zervou F, Pliakos E, Ziakas P, Mylonakis E . Colonization with toxinogenic C. difficile upon hospital admission, and risk of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015; 110(3):381-90. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.22. View