» Articles » PMID: 32036769

An Extended Discrete Element Method for the Estimation of Contact Pressure at the Ankle Joint During Stance Phase

Overview
Date 2020 Feb 11
PMID 32036769
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Abnormalities in the ankle contact pressure are related to the onset of osteoarthritis. In vivo measurements are not possible with currently available techniques, so computational methods such as the finite element analysis (FEA) are often used instead. The discrete element method (DEM), a computationally efficient alternative to time-consuming FEA, has also been used to predict the joint contact pressure. It describes the articular cartilage as a bed of independent springs, assuming a linearly elastic behaviour and absence of relative motion between the bones. In this study, we present the extended DEM (EDEM) which is able to track the motion of talus over time. The method was used, with input data from a subject-specific musculoskeletal model, to predict the contact pressure in the ankle joint during gait. Results from EDEM were also compared with outputs from conventional DEM. Predicted values of contact area were larger in EDEM than they were in DEM (4.67 and 4.18 cm, respectively). Peak values of contact pressure, attained at the toe-off, were 7.3 MPa for EDEM and 6.92 MPa for DEM. Values predicted from EDEM fell well within the ranges reported in the literature. Overall, the motion of the talus had more effect on the extension and shape of the pressure distribution than it had on the magnitude of the pressure. The results indicated that EDEM is a valid methodology for the prediction of ankle contact pressure during daily activities.

Citing Articles

Congruent Weber-B ankle fractures do not alter tibiotalar contact mechanics.

Peiffer M, Sharma S, Karaismailoglu B, Burssens A, Ashkani-Esfahani S, DiGiovanni C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26797.

PMID: 39500781 PMC: 11538441. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78172-1.


Quantifying walking speeds in relation to ankle biomechanics on a real-time interactive gait platform: a musculoskeletal modeling approach in healthy adults.

Peiffer M, Duquesne K, Delanghe M, Van Oevelen A, De Mits S, Audenaert E Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1348977.

PMID: 38515625 PMC: 10956131. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1348977.

References
1.
Macko V, Matthews L, Zwirkoski P, Goldstein S . The joint-contact area of the ankle. The contribution of the posterior malleolus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991; 73(3):347-51. View

2.
Beaudoin A, Fiore S, Krause W, Adelaar R . Effect of isolated talocalcaneal fusion on contact in the ankle and talonavicular joints. Foot Ankle. 1991; 12(1):19-25. DOI: 10.1177/107110079101200104. View

3.
Wan L, de Asla R, Rubash H, Li G . In vivo cartilage contact deformation of human ankle joints under full body weight. J Orthop Res. 2008; 26(8):1081-9. DOI: 10.1002/jor.20593. View

4.
Li L, Buschmann M, Shirazi-Adl A . Strain-rate dependent stiffness of articular cartilage in unconfined compression. J Biomech Eng. 2003; 125(2):161-8. DOI: 10.1115/1.1560142. View

5.
Watanabe K, Kitaoka H, Berglund L, Zhao K, Kaufman K, An K . The role of ankle ligaments and articular geometry in stabilizing the ankle. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2011; 27(2):189-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.08.015. View