» Articles » PMID: 32035805

The 100 Top-cited Systematic Reviews/meta-analyses in Central Venous Catheter Research: A PRISMA-compliant Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Critical Care
Nursing
Date 2020 Feb 10
PMID 32035805
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The central venous catheter is used extensively worldwide. The purpose of this bibliometric analysis was to identify the 100 top-cited systematic reviews/meta-analyses in the literature on central venous catheters and to capture the most important trends in this area of research.

Research Methodology: A search was performed in the Web of Science Core Collection on studies published prior to November 12th, 2019. The search terms included central venous catheter, systematic review and meta-analysis. Retrieved studies were ranked by citation number and selected by two of the authors. Information such as citation number, author, institution, country and year of publication was collected.

Results: The 100 top-cited studies published between 1992 and 2017 were reviewed, with the largest proportion published in 2008 (n = 17). The number of citations ranged from 14 to 660. The country with the largest number of studies was the United States of America (n = 36). Critical Care Medicine published the greatest number of these studies (n = 13). The largest number of these studies were focused on central venous catheter-related infection (n = 56) and thrombosis (n = 19).

Conclusion: Developed countries were the most productive in the field of central venous catheters. Most meta-analyses focused on complications associated with central-venous catheters such as infection and thrombosis.

Citing Articles

Observational, retrospective real-world evidence study demonstrates safety, performance and usefulness of antimicrobial central venous catheters.

Philbeck T, Bardin A, McDonald J J Int Med Res. 2024; 52(9):3000605241279236.

PMID: 39308254 PMC: 11425742. DOI: 10.1177/03000605241279236.


The effect of different flushing and locking techniques on catheter occlusion rates in central venous catheters: protocol for a multicentre, randomized controlled, parallel-group, open-label, superiority clinical trial.

Li R, Zhou M, Sun L, Sha L, Xu B, Li T Trials. 2024; 25(1):380.

PMID: 38867301 PMC: 11170772. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08141-6.


Emphysematous thrombophlebitis caused by a misplaced central venous catheter: A case report.

Chen N, Chen H, Chen T, Zhang W, Fu X, Xing Z World J Clin Cases. 2023; 11(29):7207-7213.

PMID: 37946778 PMC: 10631420. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i29.7207.


Risk factors for peripheral intravascular catheter-related phlebitis in critically ill patients: analysis of 3429 catheters from 23 Japanese intensive care units.

Yasuda H, Rickard C, Marsh N, Yamamoto R, Kotani Y, Kishihara Y Ann Intensive Care. 2022; 12(1):33.

PMID: 35394571 PMC: 8994002. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-022-01009-5.


Medical and Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media: Bibliometric Study of the Scientific Literature.

Yeung A, Tosevska A, Klager E, Eibensteiner F, Tsagkaris C, Parvanov E J Med Internet Res. 2021; 24(1):e28152.

PMID: 34951864 PMC: 8793917. DOI: 10.2196/28152.