» Articles » PMID: 32028958

Evaluation of Serum MUC5AC in Combination with CA19-9 for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2020 Feb 8
PMID 32028958
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a highly aggressive tumor with a poor prognosis that lacks specific diagnostic markers. Mucin 5AC (MUC5AC) is a member of the mucin family, a heterogeneous group of high molecular weight, heavily glycosylated proteins that could be either membrane-bound or secreted. This multi-central study is to evaluate the performance of serum MUC5AC in combination with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) for the diagnosis of PC in Asian.

Methods: Sixty-one patients with PC (comprised of early pancreatic cancer [n = 30] and late pancreatic cancer [n = 31] patients), 29 benign control, 35 choledocholithiasis, 25 chronic pancreatitis, and 34 healthy controls, were recruited from two hospitals. Serum levels of MUC5AC were evaluated by commercial ELISA kits. CA19-9 was measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay. The cutoff value of MUC5AC was determined based on optimal sensitivity and specificity.

Results: Serum MUC5AC in patients with PC (210.1 [100.5-423.8] ng/mL) presented higher levels than those in controls. The combined biomarker panel (MUC5AC and CA19-9) presented better performance and improved specificity to differentiate PC from controls (AUC 0.894; 95% CI (0.844-0.943), sensitivity 0.738, specificity 0.886) than CA19-9 (p = 0.043) or MUC5AC alone (p = 0.010); however, the latter two had no difference (p = 0.824).

Conclusions: Serum MUC5AC is a potential biomarker for PC. The combination with CA19-9 presents improved specificity and better performance.

Citing Articles

Novel Predictive Strategy Using CA19-9 and Fecal Elastase Levels to Make Treatment Decisions for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Kim H, Kim W, Yun W, Jung H, Han Y, Lee M Biomedicines. 2025; 13(1.

PMID: 39857647 PMC: 11763034. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13010062.


Multibiomarker panels in liquid biopsy for early detection of pancreatic cancer - a comprehensive review.

Reese K, Pantel K, Smit D J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2024; 43(1):250.

PMID: 39218911 PMC: 11367781. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-024-03166-w.


Postbiotic butyrate: role and its effects for being a potential drug and biomarker to pancreatic cancer.

Elango A, Nesam V, Sukumar P, Lawrence I, Radhakrishnan A Arch Microbiol. 2024; 206(4):156.

PMID: 38480544 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-024-03914-8.


Coagulation parameters for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in the early stage: a retrospective study.

Jiaao L, Wanli G, Kai Z, Feng G, Yunpeng P Eur J Med Res. 2023; 28(1):436.

PMID: 37848965 PMC: 10580648. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01379-x.


Pancreatic tail cancer in the setting of pancreatitis with a review of the literature: A case report.

Rho S, Martin S, Nigogosyan Z, Kushnir V, Mintz A, Hu Z Clin Case Rep. 2023; 11(10):e8023.

PMID: 37830064 PMC: 10565090. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.8023.


References
1.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. View

2.
Kaur S, Kumar S, Momi N, Sasson A, Batra S . Mucins in pancreatic cancer and its microenvironment. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 10(10):607-20. PMC: 3934431. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.120. View

3.
Stoffel E, McKernin S, Khorana A . Evaluating Susceptibility to Pancreatic Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Provisional Clinical Opinion Summary. J Oncol Pract. 2018; 15(2):108-111. DOI: 10.1200/JOP.18.00629. View

4.
Tempero M, Malafa M, Al-Hawary M, Asbun H, Bain A, Behrman S . Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017; 15(8):1028-1061. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0131. View

5.
Bunger S, Laubert T, Roblick U, Habermann J . Serum biomarkers for improved diagnostic of pancreatic cancer: a current overview. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011; 137(3):375-89. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-010-0965-x. View