Hospital Volume Threshold Associated with Higher Survival After Endovascular Recanalization Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Overview

Journal J Stroke

Date 2020 Feb 7

PMID 32027799

Citations 10

Authors

Dong-Hyun Shim

YoungSoo Kim

Jieun Roh

Jongsoo Kang

Kyung-Pil Park

Jae-Kwan Cha

Seung Kug Baik

Yoon Kim

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background And Purpose: Endovascular recanalization therapy (ERT) is becoming increasingly important in the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, the hospital volume threshold for optimal ERT remains unknown. We investigated the relationship between hospital volume of ERT and risk-adjusted patient outcomes.

Methods: From the National Health Insurance claims data in Korea, 11,745 patients with AIS who underwent ERT from July 2011 to June 2016 in 111 hospitals were selected. We measured the hospital's ERT volume and patient outcomes, including the 30-day mortality, readmission, and postprocedural intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) rates. For each outcome measure, we constructed risk-adjusted prediction models incorporating demographic variables, the modified Charlson comorbidity index, and the stroke severity index (SSI), and validated them. Risk-adjusted outcomes of AIS cases were compared across hospital quartiles to confirm the volume-outcome relationship (VOR) in ERT. Spline regression was performed to determine the volume threshold.

Results: The mean AIS volume was 14.8 cases per hospital/year and the unadjusted means of mortality, readmission, and ICH rates were 11.6%, 4.6%, and 8.6%, respectively. The VOR was observed in the risk-adjusted 30-day mortality rate across all quartile groups, and in the ICH rate between the first and fourth quartiles (P<0.05). The volume threshold was 24 cases per year.

Conclusions: There was an association between hospital volume and outcomes, and the volume threshold in ERT was identified. Policies should be developed to ensure the implementation of the AIS volume threshold for hospitals performing ERT.

Citing Articles

Association of endovascular thrombectomy volume and outcomes in acute ischemic stroke: A National Inpatient Sample Study.

Fry L, Brake A, Heskett C, De Stefano F, Williams A, Majo N Interv Neuroradiol. 2025; 15910199241312524.

PMID: 39819153 PMC: 11748394. DOI: 10.1177/15910199241312524.

Workflow and Short-Term Functional Outcomes in Simultaneous Acute Code Stroke Activation and Stroke Reperfusion Therapy.

Sarmiento R, Wagner A, Sheriff A, Taralson C, Moniz N, Opsahl J NeuroSci. 2024; 5(3):291-300.

PMID: 39483280 PMC: 11469737. DOI: 10.3390/neurosci5030023.

Geographic Access to High-Volume Mechanical Thrombectomy Centers in Florida, 2019.

Solovey L, Hsia R, Shen Y, Guterman E, Choi J, Kim A Neurol Clin Pract. 2024; 14(6):e200337.

PMID: 39282507 PMC: 11396029. DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200337.

Weekend effect on 30-day mortality for ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke analyzed using severity index and staffing level.

Kim S, Lee B, Park J, Kwak M, Jang W PLoS One. 2023; 18(6):e0283491.

PMID: 37347776 PMC: 10287008. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283491.

Annual Endovascular Thrombectomy Case Volume and Thrombectomy-capable Hospitals of Korea in Acute Stroke Care.

Park E, Hwang S, Oh J, Kim B, Bae H, Yang K J Prev Med Public Health. 2023; 56(2):145-153.

PMID: 37055356 PMC: 10111097. DOI: 10.3961/jpmph.22.318.

References

Ross J, Normand S, Wang Y, Ko D, Chen J, Drye E . Hospital volume and 30-day mortality for three common medical conditions. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(12):1110-8. PMC: 2880468. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa0907130. View

Keenan P, Normand S, Lin Z, Drye E, Bhat K, Ross J . An administrative claims measure suitable for profiling hospital performance on the basis of 30-day all-cause readmission rates among patients with heart failure. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009; 1(1):29-37. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.802686. View

Christian C, Gustafson M, Betensky R, Daley J, Zinner M . The volume-outcome relationship: don't believe everything you see. World J Surg. 2005; 29(10):1241-4. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-7993-8. View

Fargen K, Fiorella D, Mocco J . Practice makes perfect: establishing reasonable minimum thrombectomy volume requirements for stroke centers. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017; 9(8):717-719. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013209. View

Nogueira R, Jadhav A, Haussen D, Bonafe A, Budzik R, Bhuva P . Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct. N Engl J Med. 2017; 378(1):11-21. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706442. View

Powers W, Rabinstein A, Ackerson T, Adeoye O, Bambakidis N, Becker K . 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018; 49(3):e46-e110. DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158. View

English J, Yavagal D, Gupta R, Janardhan V, Zaidat O, Xavier A . Mechanical Thrombectomy-Ready Comprehensive Stroke Center Requirements and Endovascular Stroke Systems of Care: Recommendations from the Endovascular Stroke Standards Committee of the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (SVIN). Interv Neurol. 2016; 4(3-4):138-50. PMC: 4817382. DOI: 10.1159/000442715. View

Gupta R, Horev A, Nguyen T, Gandhi D, Wisco D, Glenn B . Higher volume endovascular stroke centers have faster times to treatment, higher reperfusion rates and higher rates of good clinical outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg. 2012; 5(4):294-7. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010245. View

Brinjikji W, Rabinstein A, Kallmes D, Cloft H . Patient outcomes with endovascular embolectomy therapy for acute ischemic stroke: a study of the national inpatient sample: 2006 to 2008. Stroke. 2011; 42(6):1648-52. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.607952. View

10.

Rinaldo L, Brinjikji W, Rabinstein A . Transfer to High-Volume Centers Associated With Reduced Mortality After Endovascular Treatment of Acute Stroke. Stroke. 2017; 48(5):1316-1321. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016360. View

11.

Hirshfeld Jr J, ELLIS S, Faxon D . Recommendations for the assessment and maintenance of proficiency in coronary interventional procedures: Statement of the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 31(3):722-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00009-6. View

12.

Saver J, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener H, Levy E, Pereira V . Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(24):2285-95. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415061. View

13.

Mocco J, Zaidat O, von Kummer R, Yoo A, Gupta R, Lopes D . Aspiration Thrombectomy After Intravenous Alteplase Versus Intravenous Alteplase Alone. Stroke. 2016; 47(9):2331-8. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013372. View

14.

Lee S, Chun C, Lee Y, Seo N . The National Health Insurance system as one type of new typology: the case of South Korea and Taiwan. Health Policy. 2007; 85(1):105-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.07.006. View

15.

Goldstein L, Samsa G, Matchar D, Horner R . Charlson Index comorbidity adjustment for ischemic stroke outcome studies. Stroke. 2004; 35(8):1941-5. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000135225.80898.1c. View

16.

Berkhemer O, Fransen P, Beumer D, van den Berg L, Lingsma H, Yoo A . A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2014; 372(1):11-20. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411587. View

17.

Lane-Fall M, Neuman M . Outcomes measures and risk adjustment. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2013; 51(4):10-21. PMC: 3816010. DOI: 10.1097/AIA.0b013e3182a70a52. View

18.

Goyal M, Demchuk A, Menon B, Eesa M, Rempel J, Thornton J . Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(11):1019-30. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414905. View

19.

Sung S, Hsieh C, Lin H, Chen Y, Chen C, Kao Yang Y . Validity of a stroke severity index for administrative claims data research: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16(1):509. PMC: 5034530. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1769-8. View

20.

Mokin M, Snyder K, Levy E, Hopkins L, Siddiqui A . Direct carotid artery puncture access for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: technical aspects, advantages, and limitations. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014; 7(2):108-13. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011007. View