» Articles » PMID: 32026210

Molecular Basis of Clonal Evolution in Multiple Myeloma

Overview
Journal Int J Hematol
Specialty Hematology
Date 2020 Feb 7
PMID 32026210
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The treatment outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) is worse than expected from the average numbers of non-synonymous mutations, which are roughly correlated with the prognosis of cancer patients. The refractoriness of MM may be ascribed to the complex genomic architecture and clonal behavior of the disease. In MM, disease progression is accomplished by branching patterns of subclonal evolution from reservoir clones with a propagating potential and/or the emergence of minor clones, which already exist at the MGUS stage and outcompete other clones through selective pressure mainly by therapeutic agents. Each subclone harbors novel mutations and distinct phenotypes including drug sensitivities. In general, mature clones are highly sensitive to proteasome inhibitors (PIs), whereas immature clones are resistant to PIs but could be eradicated by immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). The branching evolution is a result of the fitness of different clones to microenvironment and their evasion of immune surveillance; therefore, IMiDs are effective for MM with this pattern of evolution. In contrast, ~ 20% of MM evolve neutrally in the context of strong oncogenic drivers, such as high-risk IgH translocations, and are relatively resistant to IMiDs. Further understanding of the genomic landscape and the pattern of clonal evolution may contribute to the development of more effective treatment strategies for MM.

Citing Articles

CAR-T cells in the treatment of multiple myeloma: an encouraging cell therapy.

Yu T, Jiao J, Wu M Front Immunol. 2025; 16:1499590.

PMID: 40078993 PMC: 11897482. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1499590.


Anti‑BCMA CAR‑T cell immunotherapy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Zhang X, Ouyang C, Sun G, Liu H, Qi J, Suo X Exp Ther Med. 2023; 26(4):471.

PMID: 37664681 PMC: 10468803. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2023.12170.


Review on Bortezomib Resistance in Multiple Myeloma and Potential Role of Emerging Technologies.

Kozalak G, Butun I, Toyran E, Kosar A Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023; 16(1).

PMID: 36678608 PMC: 9864669. DOI: 10.3390/ph16010111.


Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma.

Wang Z, Chen C, Wang L, Jia Y, Qin Y Front Immunol. 2023; 13:1050522.

PMID: 36618390 PMC: 9814974. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1050522.


Preclinical evidence of a direct pro-survival role of arginine deprivation in multiple myeloma.

Trudu M, Oliva L, Orfanelli U, Romano A, Di Raimondo F, Sanvito F Front Oncol. 2022; 12:968208.

PMID: 36172163 PMC: 9512038. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.968208.


References
1.
Jackson G, Davies F, Pawlyn C, Cairns D, Striha A, Collett C . Lenalidomide maintenance versus observation for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Myeloma XI): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018; 20(1):57-73. PMC: 6318225. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30687-9. View

2.
Zhang J, Lee Y, Dang F, Gan W, Menon A, Katon J . PTEN Methylation by NSD2 Controls Cellular Sensitivity to DNA Damage. Cancer Discov. 2019; 9(9):1306-1323. PMC: 6726527. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0083. View

3.
Hebraud B, Caillot D, Corre J, Marit G, Hulin C, Leleu X . The translocation t(4;14) can be present only in minor subclones in multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013; 19(17):4634-7. PMC: 4863228. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3866. View

4.
Fujiwara Y, Sun Y, Torphy R, He J, Yanaga K, Edil B . Pomalidomide Inhibits PD-L1 Induction to Promote Antitumor Immunity. Cancer Res. 2018; 78(23):6655-6665. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-1781. View

5.
Walker B, Wardell C, Melchor L, Hulkki S, Potter N, Johnson D . Intraclonal heterogeneity and distinct molecular mechanisms characterize the development of t(4;14) and t(11;14) myeloma. Blood. 2012; 120(5):1077-86. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-412981. View