» Articles » PMID: 32025834

Ruling out Rotator Cuff Tear in Shoulder Radiograph Series Using Deep Learning: Redefining the Role of Conventional Radiograph

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2020 Feb 7
PMID 32025834
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To develop a deep learning algorithm that can rule out significant rotator cuff tear based on conventional shoulder radiographs in patients suspected of rotator cuff tear.

Methods: The algorithm was developed using 6793 shoulder radiograph series performed between January 2015 and June 2018, which were labeled based on ultrasound or MRI conducted within 90 days, and clinical information (age, sex, dominant side, history of trauma, degree of pain). The output was the probability of significant rotator cuff tear (supraspinatus/infraspinatus complex tear with > 50% of tendon thickness). An operating point corresponding to sensitivity of 98% was set to achieve high negative predictive value (NPV) and low negative likelihood ratio (LR-). The performance of the algorithm was tested with 1095 radiograph series performed between July and December 2018. Subgroup analysis using Fisher's exact test was performed to identify factors (clinical information, radiography vendor, advanced imaging modality) associated with negative test results and NPV.

Results: Sensitivity, NPV, and LR- were 97.3%, 96.6%, and 0.06, respectively. The deep learning algorithm could rule out significant rotator cuff tear in about 30% of patients suspected of rotator cuff tear. The subgroup analysis showed that age < 60 years (p < 0.001), non-dominant side (p < 0.001), absence of trauma history (p = 0.001), and ultrasound examination (p < 0.001) were associated with negative test results. NPVs were higher in patients with age < 60 years (p = 0.024) and examined with ultrasound (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The deep learning algorithm could accurately rule out significant rotator cuff tear based on shoulder radiographs.

Key Points: • The deep learning algorithm can rule out significant rotator cuff tear with a negative likelihood ratio of 0.06 and a negative predictive value of 96.6%. • The deep learning algorithm can guide patients with significant rotator cuff tear to additional shoulder ultrasound or MRI with a sensitivity of 97.3%. • The deep learning algorithm could rule out significant rotator cuff tear in about 30% of patients with clinically suspected rotator cuff tear.

Citing Articles

Application of Artificial Intelligence in Shoulder Pathology.

Cheng C, Liang X, Guo D, Xie D Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 38893618 PMC: 11171621. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14111091.


Pre-operative Assessment of Shoulder Pathologies on MRI by a Radiologist and an Orthopaedic Surgeon.

Winkler S, Herbst B, Kafchitsas K, Wohlmuth P, Hoffstetter P, Rueth M Malays Orthop J. 2024; 18(1):42-50.

PMID: 38638663 PMC: 11023335. DOI: 10.5704/MOJ.2403.006.


Deep-Learning-Based Automated Rotator Cuff Tear Screening in Three Planes of Shoulder MRI.

Lee K, Cho Y, Ahn K, Park H, Kang Y, Lee S Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(20).

PMID: 37892075 PMC: 10606560. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13203254.


Application of Machine Learning Algorithms for Prognostic Assessment in Rotator Cuff Pathologies: A Clinical Data-Based Approach.

Longo U, Di Naro C, Campisi S, Casciaro C, Bandini B, Pareek A Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(18).

PMID: 37761282 PMC: 10530213. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13182915.


Artificial intelligence-based applications in shoulder surgery leaves much to be desired: a systematic review.

Gupta P, Haeberle H, Zimmer Z, Levine W, Williams R, Ramkumar P JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023; 3(2):189-200.

PMID: 37588443 PMC: 10426484. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.12.006.


References
1.
Sayampanathan A, Andrew T . Systematic review on risk factors of rotator cuff tears. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017; 25(1):2309499016684318. DOI: 10.1177/2309499016684318. View

2.
Bachmann L, Kolb E, Koller M, Steurer J, Ter Riet G . Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review. BMJ. 2003; 326(7386):417. PMC: 149439. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7386.417. View

3.
Cone 3rd R, Resnick D, Danzig L . Shoulder impingement syndrome: radiographic evaluation. Radiology. 1984; 150(1):29-33. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.150.1.6689783. View

4.
Mayerhoefer M, Breitenseher M, Roposch A, Treitl C, Wurnig C . Comparison of MRI and conventional radiography for assessment of acromial shape. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184(2):671-5. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.184.2.01840671. View

5.
Lenza M, Buchbinder R, Takwoingi Y, Johnston R, Hanchard N, Faloppa F . Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and ultrasonography for assessing rotator cuff tears in people with shoulder pain for whom surgery is being considered. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (9):CD009020. PMC: 6464715. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009020.pub2. View