» Articles » PMID: 32019492

Influence of Female Cuticular Hydrocarbon (CHC) Profile on Male Courtship Behavior in Two Hybridizing Field Crickets Gryllus Firmus and Gryllus Pennsylvanicus

Overview
Journal BMC Evol Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Feb 6
PMID 32019492
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The hybridizing field crickets, Gryllus firmus and Gryllus pennsylvanicus have several barriers that prevent gene flow between species. The behavioral pre-zygotic mating barrier, where males court conspecifics more intensely than heterospecifics, is important because by acting earlier in the life cycle it has the potential to prevent a larger fraction of hybridization. The mechanism behind such male mate preference is unknown. Here we investigate if the female cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profile could be the signal behind male courtship.

Results: While males of the two species display nearly identical CHC profiles, females have different, albeit overlapping profiles and some females (between 15 and 45%) of both species display a male-like profile distinct from profiles of typical females. We classified CHC females profile into three categories: G. firmus-like (F; including mainly G. firmus females), G. pennsylvanicus-like (P; including mainly G. pennsylvanicus females), and male-like (ML; including females of both species). Gryllus firmus males courted ML and F females more often and faster than they courted P females (p < 0.05). Gryllus pennsylvanicus males were slower to court than G. firmus males, but courted ML females more often (p < 0.05) than their own conspecific P females (no difference between P and F). Both males courted heterospecific ML females more often than other heterospecific females (p < 0.05, significant only for G. firmus males).

Conclusions: Our results suggest that male mate preference is at least partially informed by female CHC profile and that ML females elicit high courtship behavior in both species. Since ML females exist in both species and are preferred over other heterospecific females, it is likely that this female type is responsible for most hybrid offspring production.

Citing Articles

The Entomo-Toxicological Effect Of Dichlorvos on Cuticular Hydrocarbon Profiles of Some Sarco-Saprophagous Insects for Forensic Applications.

Michael A, Okoye I J Chem Ecol. 2025; 51(1):17.

PMID: 39893324 DOI: 10.1007/s10886-025-01558-6.


Patterns of Genomic Heterogeneity in a Classic Field Cricket Mosaic Hybrid Zone.

Maroja L, Barradale F, Espinoza-Ulloa S, Bogdanowicz S, Andres J Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(12):e70643.

PMID: 39624643 PMC: 11608878. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70643.


Chemical and transcriptomic diversity do not correlate with ascending levels of social complexity in the insect order Blattodea.

Golian M, Friedman D, Harrison M, McMahon D, Buellesbach J Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(8):e70063.

PMID: 39091327 PMC: 11289792. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70063.


Behavioural consequences of intraspecific variability in a mate recognition signal.

Steurer M, Ruther J, Pokorny T Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2018):20232518.

PMID: 38444335 PMC: 10915540. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2518.


Neglected Very Long-Chain Hydrocarbons and the Incorporation of Body Surface Area Metrics Reveal Novel Perspectives for Cuticular Profile Analysis in Insects.

Golian M, Bien T, Schmelzle S, Esparza-Mora M, McMahon D, Dreisewerd K Insects. 2022; 13(1).

PMID: 35055926 PMC: 8778109. DOI: 10.3390/insects13010083.


References
1.
Weddle C, Steiger S, Hamaker C, Ower G, Mitchell C, Sakaluk S . Cuticular hydrocarbons as a basis for chemosensory self-referencing in crickets: a potentially universal mechanism facilitating polyandry in insects. Ecol Lett. 2013; 16(3):346-53. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12046. View

2.
Sanchez-Guillen R, Cordero-Rivera A, Rivas-Torres A, Wellenreuther M, Bybee S, Hansson B . Retracted: The evolutionary history of colour polymorphism in Ischnura damselflies. J Evol Biol. 2018; 33(4):551. DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13289. View

3.
Byrne P, Rice W . Evidence for adaptive male mate choice in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Biol Sci. 2006; 273(1589):917-22. PMC: 1560241. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3372. View

4.
Coyne J, Crittenden A, Mah K . Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science. 1994; 265(5177):1461-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.8073292. View

5.
Chung H, Loehlin D, Dufour H, Vaccarro K, Millar J, Carroll S . A single gene affects both ecological divergence and mate choice in Drosophila. Science. 2014; 343(6175):1148-51. DOI: 10.1126/science.1249998. View