» Articles » PMID: 32016861

Effects of Biochar Particle Size and Concomitant Nitrogen Fertilization on Soil Microbial Community Structure During the Maize Seedling Stage

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2020 Feb 5
PMID 32016861
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Biochar is widely used as a soil amendment, either alone or in association with fertilizer. However, the effects of biochar particle size on the soil microbial community are largely unclear. Biochar was divided into two groups according to diameter sizes: < 1 mm and 2.5-5 mm (labeled as CB1 and CB5, respectively). A pot experiment was established in which maize (Zea maize L.) was treated with CB1, CB5, and/or external nitrogen (N, NHNO). At the end of the seedling period (45 days), analyses of soil microbial community structure and other soil and crop properties were conducted. The biochar (regardless of N addition) enhanced microbial biomass and activity. CB1 had a stronger capacity than CB5 to modify soil microbial community structure by promoting soil microbial groups (e.g., fungi, Gram-negative bacteria), which is likely due to CB1 undergoing a series of more intense processes (e.g., nutrient release, mineralization) than CB5. However, this difference was diminished or disappeared when N was added, mainly due to the masking effect of soil acidification that was induced by N fertilization. Collectively, fine biochar has a stronger effect on soil microbial community than coarse biochar. Particle size only affects soil microbial community structure when biochar is applied alone; it has no effect when biochar is applied in association with chemical N fertilizer, at least during the seedling period. The relationship between particle size and soil microbial community needs to be considered when using biochar for soil amendment.

Citing Articles

Effects of biochar amendment and organic fertilizer on microbial communities in the rhizosphere soil of wheat in Yellow River Delta saline-alkaline soil.

Li M, Chen C, Zhang H, Wang Z, Song N, Li J Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1250453.

PMID: 37808323 PMC: 10556502. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1250453.

References
1.
Manya J . Pyrolysis for biochar purposes: a review to establish current knowledge gaps and research needs. Environ Sci Technol. 2012; 46(15):7939-54. DOI: 10.1021/es301029g. View

2.
Sheng Y, Zhu L . Biochar alters microbial community and carbon sequestration potential across different soil pH. Sci Total Environ. 2018; 622-623:1391-1399. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.337. View

3.
Treseder K . Nitrogen additions and microbial biomass: a meta-analysis of ecosystem studies. Ecol Lett. 2008; 11(10):1111-20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01230.x. View

4.
Clemmensen K, Finlay R, Dahlberg A, Stenlid J, Wardle D, Lindahl B . Carbon sequestration is related to mycorrhizal fungal community shifts during long-term succession in boreal forests. New Phytol. 2014; 205(4):1525-1536. DOI: 10.1111/nph.13208. View

5.
Raaijmakers J, Mazzola M . ECOLOGY. Soil immune responses. Science. 2016; 352(6292):1392-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf3252. View