» Articles » PMID: 32015429

The Consequences of Craniofacial Integration for the Adaptive Radiations of Darwin's Finches and Hawaiian Honeycreepers

Overview
Journal Nat Ecol Evol
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Feb 5
PMID 32015429
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The diversifications of Darwin's finches and Hawaiian honeycreepers are two text-book examples of adaptive radiation in birds. Why these two bird groups radiated while the remaining endemic birds in these two archipelagos exhibit relatively low diversity and disparity remains unexplained. Ecological factors have failed to provide a convincing answer to this phenomenon, and some intrinsic causes connected to craniofacial evolution have been hypothesized. The tight coevolution of the beak and the remainder of the skull in diurnal raptors and parrots suggests that integration may be the prevalent condition in landbirds (Inopinaves). This is in contrast with the archetypal relationship between beak shape and ecology in Darwin's finches and Hawaiian honeycreepers, which suggests that the beak can adapt as a distinct module in these birds. Modularity has therefore been proposed to underpin the adaptive radiation of these groups, allowing the beak to evolve more rapidly and freely in response to ecological opportunity. Here, using geometric morphometrics and phylogenetic comparative methods in a broad sample of landbird skulls, we show that craniofacial evolution in Darwin's finches and Hawaiian honeycreepers seems to be characterized by a tighter coevolution of the beak and the rest of the skull (cranial integration) than in most landbird lineages, with rapid and extreme morphological evolution of both skull regions along constrained directions of phenotypic space. These patterns are unique among landbirds, including other sympatric island radiations, and therefore counter previous hypotheses by showing that tighter cranial integration, not only modularity, can facilitate evolution along adaptive directions.

Citing Articles

Adaptive or non-adaptive? Cranial evolution in a radiation of miniaturized day geckos.

Lobon-Rovira J, Marugan-Lobon J, Nebreda S, Buckley D, Stanley E, Kohnk S BMC Ecol Evol. 2024; 24(1):150.

PMID: 39730989 PMC: 11673686. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-024-02344-w.


Spatiotemporal Pattern of a Macrofungal Genus () Revealing Its Adaptive Evolution in China.

Wang X, Zhou L J Fungi (Basel). 2024; 10(11).

PMID: 39590699 PMC: 11595563. DOI: 10.3390/jof10110780.


Developmental bias as a cause and consequence of adaptive radiation and divergence.

Stansfield C, Parsons K Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 12:1453566.

PMID: 39479512 PMC: 11521891. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1453566.


The evolution of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis and host-plant switches are the main drivers for diversification of Amanitaceae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota).

Cai Q, Codjia J, Buyck B, Cui Y, Ryberg M, Yorou N BMC Biol. 2024; 22(1):230.

PMID: 39390520 PMC: 11465788. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-024-02031-8.


Trait Variation and Spatiotemporal Dynamics across Avian Secondary Contact Zones.

Wang S, Wu L, Zhu Q, Wu J, Tang S, Zhao Y Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 39194581 PMC: 11351749. DOI: 10.3390/biology13080643.


References
1.
Jetz W, Thomas G, Joy J, Hartmann K, Mooers A . The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature. 2012; 491(7424):444-8. DOI: 10.1038/nature11631. View

2.
Cooney C, Bright J, Capp E, Chira A, Hughes E, Moody C . Mega-evolutionary dynamics of the adaptive radiation of birds. Nature. 2017; 542(7641):344-347. PMC: 5321581. DOI: 10.1038/nature21074. View

3.
Burns K, Hackett S, Klein N . Phylogenetic relationships and morphological diversity in Darwin's finches and their relatives. Evolution. 2002; 56(6):1240-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01435.x. View

4.
Arbogast B, Drovetski S, Curry R, Boag P, Seutin G, Grant P . The origin and diversification of Galapagos mockingbirds. Evolution. 2006; 60(2):370-82. View

5.
Tokita M, Yano W, James H, Abzhanov A . Cranial shape evolution in adaptive radiations of birds: comparative morphometrics of Darwin's finches and Hawaiian honeycreepers. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016; 372(1713). PMC: 5182413. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0481. View