» Articles » PMID: 32015392

Resistance to Change: AMR Gene Dynamics on a Commercial Pig Farm with High Antimicrobial Usage

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Feb 5
PMID 32015392
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Group antimicrobial administration is used to control disease in livestock, but we have little insight into how this impacts antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene dynamics. Here, a longitudinal study was carried out during a single production cycle on a commercial pig unit with high historic and current antimicrobial usage. Quantitative PCR, 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding and shotgun metagenomic sequencing were used to track faecal AMR gene abundance and diversity and microbiome alpha diversity. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing identified 144 AMR genes in total, with higher AMR gene diversity present in young pigs compared to dry sows. Irrespective of in-feed antibiotic treatment or changes in microbiome diversity, mean AMR gene copy number was consistently high, with some AMR genes present at copy numbers comparable to the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. In conclusion, AMR gene prevalence and abundance were not influenced by antibiotic use, either during the production cycle or following whole-herd medication. The high levels of certain genes indicate they are widely disseminated throughout the microbial population, potentially aiding stability. Despite the high and relatively stable levels of resistance genes against the main antimicrobials used, these compounds continue to control production limiting diseases on this unit.

Citing Articles

Florfenicol administration in piglets co-selects for multiple antimicrobial resistance genes.

Holman D, Gzyl K, Kommadath A mSystems. 2024; 9(12):e0125024.

PMID: 39584815 PMC: 11651103. DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01250-24.


Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Commensal from Pig Fecal Samples and Enhanced Sensitivity for Direct Detection of the Gene by Nested PCR.

Suchanta N, Ullah N, Santanirand P, Am-In N, Chaichanawongsaroj N Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(18).

PMID: 39335221 PMC: 11428893. DOI: 10.3390/ani14182630.


Effects of dietary zinc on the gut microbiome and resistome of the gestating cow and neonatal calf.

Drake M, Daniel S, Baker L, Indugu N, Bittinger K, Dickens C Anim Microbiome. 2024; 6(1):39.

PMID: 39030654 PMC: 11264502. DOI: 10.1186/s42523-024-00326-3.


An economic assessment of alternative antimicrobial use scenarios on pig farms.

Shrestha S, da Costa M, Correia-Gomes C, Nevel A, McGowan A, Tongue S Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1381499.

PMID: 38746928 PMC: 11091415. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1381499.


Gut microbiome and resistome characterization of pigs treated with commonly used post-weaning diarrhea treatments.

Guitart-Matas J, Ballester M, Fraile L, Darwich L, Giler-Baquerizo N, Tarres J Anim Microbiome. 2024; 6(1):24.

PMID: 38702766 PMC: 11067243. DOI: 10.1186/s42523-024-00307-6.


References
1.
Singer R, Reid-Smith R, Sischo W . Stakeholder position paper: epidemiological perspectives on antibiotic use in animals. Prev Vet Med. 2005; 73(2-3):153-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.09.019. View

2.
Novais C, Freitas A, Silveira E, Antunes P, Silva R, Coque T . Spread of multidrug-resistant Enterococcus to animals and humans: an underestimated role for the pig farm environment. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013; 68(12):2746-54. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkt289. View

3.
Smith T, Gebreyes W, Abley M, Harper A, Forshey B, Male M . Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs and farm workers on conventional and antibiotic-free swine farms in the USA. PLoS One. 2013; 8(5):e63704. PMC: 3646818. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063704. View

4.
Khanna T, Friendship R, Dewey C, Weese J . Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in pigs and pig farmers. Vet Microbiol. 2007; 128(3-4):298-303. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.10.006. View

5.
Su J, Wei B, Ou-Yang W, Huang F, Zhao Y, Xu H . Antibiotic resistome and its association with bacterial communities during sewage sludge composting. Environ Sci Technol. 2015; 49(12):7356-63. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01012. View