Anal Function and Quality of Life Analysis After Laparoscopic Modified Parks for Ultra-low Rectal Cancer Patients

Overview

Journal World J Surg Oncol

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties General Surgery
Oncology

Date 2020 Feb 5

PMID 32013992

Citations 3

Authors

Haibo Ding

Jian Li

Yuxiang Chen

Zhi Yang

Zha Peng

Xin Liao

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: To assess postoperative anal function and quality of life of ultra-low rectal cancer patients treated by laparoscopic modified Parks surgery.

Methods: From February 2017 to March 2019, 114 patients with ultra-low rectal cancer above T2 were treated respectively with ultra-low anterior resection (Dixon), modified coloanal anastomosis (modified Parks), and Miles according to the preoperative stage and anastomotic position. The postoperative anal function and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL) of each patient were collected and synthetically analyzed.

Results: Compared with the Dixon group, the postoperative anal function and FIQL in the Parks group were poor at the early stage. However, from 6 to 12 months after surgery, the scores of anal function and FIQL in the Parks group were similar to those in the Dixon group (P > 0.05). Compared with the Miles group, the FIQL of the two groups were similar in the early postoperative stage. However, with the passage of time, from 3 to 9 months after surgery, the four domains of FIQL in the Parks group were higher than those in the Miles group successively (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Laparoscopic modified Parks is a safe, effective, and economical anus-preserving surgery. Although its early anal function and FIQL were poor, it could gradually recover to the similar level as Dixon. Moreover, it can save the anus and obtain a better postoperative quality of life for some patients who previously could only undergo Miles.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the learning curve for conformal sphincter preservation operation in the treatment of ultralow rectal cancer.

Ding H, Wang L, Sun G, Yu G, Gao X, Zheng K World J Surg Oncol. 2022; 20(1):102.

PMID: 35354489 PMC: 8966240. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02541-1.

Quality of life in restorative versus non-restorative resections for rectal cancer: systematic review.

Lawday S, Flamey N, Fowler G, Leaning M, Dyar N, Daniels I BJS Open. 2022; 5(6).

PMID: 35040944 PMC: 8765336. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab101.

The efficacy of ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis.

Mu Y, Zhao L, He H, Zhao H, Li J World J Surg Oncol. 2021; 19(1):318.

PMID: 34732226 PMC: 8567543. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02432-x.

References

Bossema E, Seuntiens M, Marijnen C, Baas-Thijssen M, van de Velde C, Stiggelbout A . The relation between illness cognitions and quality of life in people with and without a stoma following rectal cancer treatment. Psychooncology. 2010; 20(4):428-34. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1758. View

Mascagni D, Pironi D, Pontone S, Tonda M, Eberspacher C, Panarese A . Total fistulectomy, sphincteroplasty and closure of the residual cavity for trans-sphincteric perianal fistula in the elderly patient. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2016; 29(Suppl 1):101-108. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-016-0652-0. View

Yamada K, Saiki Y, Takano S, Iwamoto K, Tanaka M, Fukunaga M . Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer in Japan. Surg Today. 2019; 49(4):275-285. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-018-1754-4. View

Fokas E, Allgauer M, Polat B, Klautke G, Grabenbauer G, Fietkau R . Randomized Phase II Trial of Chemoradiotherapy Plus Induction or Consolidation Chemotherapy as Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: CAO/ARO/AIO-12. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37(34):3212-3222. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.00308. View

Dossa F, Acuna S, Rickles A, Berho M, Wexner S, Quereshy F . Association Between Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Overall Survival in Patients With Rectal Cancer and Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Resection. JAMA Oncol. 2018; 4(7):930-937. PMC: 6145724. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5597. View

Gooszen A, Geelkerken R, Hermans J, Lagaay M, Gooszen H . Quality of life with a temporary stoma: ileostomy vs. colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43(5):650-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF02235581. View

Simmons K, Smith J, Bobb K, Liles L . Adjustment to colostomy: stoma acceptance, stoma care self-efficacy and interpersonal relationships. J Adv Nurs. 2007; 60(6):627-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04446.x. View

Kwok S, Lau W, Carey P, Kelly S, Leung K, Li A . Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted large bowel excision for cancer. Ann Surg. 1996; 223(2):170-6. PMC: 1235093. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199602000-00009. View

Peng Z, Li J, Ding H . [Laparoscopy combined with total intersphincteric resection for extremely low rectal cancer]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019; 43(11):1223-1229. DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2018.11.009. View

10.

Barrera T, Cully J, Amspoker A, Wilson N, Kraus-Schuman C, Wagener P . Cognitive-behavioral therapy for late-life anxiety: Similarities and differences between Veteran and community participants. J Anxiety Disord. 2015; 33:72-80. PMC: 4479977. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.04.005. View

11.

Hayes S, Luoma J, Bond F, Masuda A, Lillis J . Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2005; 44(1):1-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006. View

12.

Prete F, Prete F, De Luca R, Nitti P, Sammarco D, Preziosa G . Restorative proctectomy with colon pouch-anal anastomosis by laparoscopic transanal pull-through: an available option for low rectal cancer?. Surg Endosc. 2006; 21(1):91-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-9263-5. View

13.

Denost Q, Adam J, Pontallier A, Celerier B, Laurent C, Rullier E . Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2014; 261(1):138-43. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000855. View

14.

Albaugh J, Tenfelde S, Hayden D . Sexual Dysfunction and Intimacy for Ostomates. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017; 30(3):201-206. PMC: 5498165. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1598161. View

15.

Peeters K, Marijnen C, Nagtegaal I, Kranenbarg E, Putter H, Wiggers T . The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007; 246(5):693-701. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000257358.56863.ce. View

16.

Mukkai Krishnamurty D, Blatnik J, Mutch M . Stoma Complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017; 30(3):193-200. PMC: 5498161. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1598160. View

17.

Zuo Z, Ding K, Tang T, Zhang L, Peng W, Deng Y . Analysis of Clinical Efficiency and Safety of Laparoscopic Anus-Conserving Operation for Ultralow Rectal Cancer. Am Surg. 2019; 85(5):539-548. View

18.

Yau T, Watkins D, Cunningham D, Barbachano Y, Chau I, Chong G . Longitudinal assessment of quality of life in rectal cancer patients with or without stomas following primary resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009; 52(4):669-77. DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819eb970. View

19.

Guan X, Liu Z, Longo A, Cai J, Chen W, Chen L . International consensus on natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2019; 7(1):24-31. PMC: 6375350. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goy055. View

20.

Nissan A, Guillem J, Paty P, Wong W, Minsky B, Saltz L . Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer at a specialty center. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002; 44(1):27-35; discussion 35-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF02234816. View