» Articles » PMID: 32012977

Patient-Controlled Intravenous Morphine Analgesia Combined with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Post-Thoracotomy Pain: A Cost-Effectiveness Study and A Feasibility For Its Future Implementation

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Feb 5
PMID 32012977
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This prospective randomized study aims to evaluate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of combining transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with patient controlled intravenous morphine analgesia (PCA-IV) as part of multimodal analgesia after thoracotomy. Patients assigned to the active treatment group (a-tDCS, = 27) received tDCS over the left primary motor cortex for five days, whereas patients assigned to the control group (sham-tDCS, = 28) received sham tDCS stimulations. All patients received postoperative PCA-IV morphine. For cost-effectiveness analysis we used data about total amount of PCA-IV morphine and maximum visual analog pain scale with cough (VASP-C). Direct costs of hospitalization were assumed as equal for both groups. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as the incremental cost (RSD or US$) per incremental gain in mm of VASP-C reduction. Calculated ICER was 510.87 RSD per VASP-C 1 mm reduction. Conversion on USA market (USA data 1.325 US$ for 1 mg of morphine) revealed ICER of 189.08 US$ or 18960.39 RSD/1 VASP-C 1 mm reduction. Cost-effectiveness expressed through ICER showed significant reduction of PCA-IV morphine costs in the tDCS group. Further investigation of tDCS benefits with regards to reduction of postoperative pain treatment costs should also include the long-term benefits of reduced morphine use.

Citing Articles

Cost-effectiveness of the Perioperative Pain Management Bundle a registry-based study.

Bojic S, Ladjevic N, Palibrk I, Soldatovic I, Likic-Ladjevic I, Meissner W Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1157484.

PMID: 37744520 PMC: 10513912. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1157484.


Reimagining How We Treat Acute Pain: A Narrative Review.

Castroman P, Quiroga O, Mayoral Rojals V, Gomez M, Moka E, Pergolizzi Jr J Cureus. 2022; 14(4):e23992.

PMID: 35547466 PMC: 9084930. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23992.


Noninvasive brain stimulation combined with exercise in chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cardenas-Rojas A, Pacheco-Barrios K, Giannoni-Luza S, Rivera-Torrejon O, Fregni F Expert Rev Neurother. 2020; 20(4):401-412.

PMID: 32130037 PMC: 7245447. DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1738927.

References
1.
DUrso G, DellOsso B, Rossi R, Brunoni A, Bortolomasi M, Ferrucci R . Clinical predictors of acute response to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in major depression. J Affect Disord. 2017; 219:25-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.05.019. View

2.
Ribeiro H, Sesterhenn R, de Souza A, de Souza A, Alves M, Machado J . Preoperative transcranial direct current stimulation: Exploration of a novel strategy to enhance neuroplasticity before surgery to control postoperative pain. A randomized sham-controlled study. PLoS One. 2017; 12(11):e0187013. PMC: 5708693. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187013. View

3.
Stagg C, Lin R, Mezue M, Segerdahl A, Kong Y, Xie J . Widespread modulation of cerebral perfusion induced during and after transcranial direct current stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(28):11425-31. PMC: 3724554. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3887-12.2013. View

4.
Gan T, Habib A, Miller T, White W, Apfelbaum J . Incidence, patient satisfaction, and perceptions of post-surgical pain: results from a US national survey. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013; 30(1):149-60. DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2013.860019. View

5.
Neumann P, Sanders G . Cost-Effectiveness Analysis 2.0. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(3):203-205. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1612619. View