» Articles » PMID: 32012474

Totally Mechanical Linear Stapled Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: Operative Technique and Short-term Outcomes

Overview
Journal Thorac Cancer
Date 2020 Feb 4
PMID 32012474
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Anastomosis is one of the important factors affecting anastomotic complications after esophagectomy, and multiple reports have compared anastomotic complications among various techniques. However, there is insufficient evidence in the literature to definitively recommend one anastomotic technique over another.

Method: We retrospectively evaluated 34 consecutive patients who underwent an improved totally mechanical side-to-side: posterior-to-posterior linear stapled (TM-STS) technique for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagogastric anastomosis, performed by a single surgeon between February 2015 to November 2017. The operative techniques and short-term outcomes are analyzed in this study.

Results: There were no conversions to an open approach and a complete resection was achieved in all patients undergoing this improved procedure. During the first half of the series, the median operation time was 355 minutes, ranging from 257 to 480 minutes. Over the second half of this series, the median operation time was reduced to 256 minutes. There were no mortalities or serious postoperative complications. Only one patient (2.9%) had an anastomotic leak, which resolved without intervention. Another patient (2.9%) experienced transient, delayed conduit emptying which upper gastrointestinal radiography determined was due to a mechanical obstruction caused by an abnormally long gastric tube in the chest cavity.

Conclusions: The results of our study suggest that this improved TM-STS technique is safe and effective for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, and can be considered as one of the alternative procedure for patients with lower esophageal as well as Siewert types I/II gastroesophageal junction carcinoma.

Citing Articles

Outcomes of a novel double-stapled anastomotic technique in esophagectomy.

Godfrey C, Grogan E, Marmor H, Johannesen Ringenberg S, Demarest C, Lambright E JTCVS Tech. 2024; 28:168-172.

PMID: 39669326 PMC: 11632342. DOI: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.08.007.


Technical details for a robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis during minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Peri A, Furbetta N, Vigano J, Pugliese L, Di Franco G, Latteri F Surg Endosc. 2021; 36(2):1675-1682.

PMID: 34499220 PMC: 8428217. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08715-4.


Comparison of a modified one-piece mechanical and double-layer hand-sewn anastomosis in McKeown esophagogastrectomy: A single-institute retrospective study.

Zhu K, Zhang J, Chen X, Deng Y, Lin S, Cai Y Mol Clin Oncol. 2021; 15(1):134.

PMID: 34055349 PMC: 8138850. DOI: 10.3892/mco.2021.2296.


Side-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis for minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: operative technique and short-term outcomes.

Fabbi M, De Pascale S, Ascari F, Petz W, Romario U Updates Surg. 2021; 73(5):1837-1847.

PMID: 33900550 PMC: 8500894. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01054-y.

References
1.
Orringer M, Marshall B, Iannettoni M . Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000; 119(2):277-88. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(00)70183-8. View

2.
van Workum F, Slaman A, van Berge Henegouwen M, Gisbertz S, Kouwenhoven E, van Det M . Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2018; 271(1):128-133. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002982. View

3.
Sudarshan M, Ferri L . A critical review of minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012; 22(4):310-8. DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182582d2c. View

4.
Kayani B, Jarral O, Athanasiou T, Zacharakis E . Should oesophagectomy be performed with cervical or intrathoracic anastomosis?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012; 14(6):821-6. PMC: 3352713. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs036. View

5.
Sakamoto T, Fujiogi M, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H . Comparing Perioperative Mortality and Morbidity of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Retrospective Analysis. Ann Surg. 2019; 274(2):324-330. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003500. View