» Articles » PMID: 32011900

A Novel Method for Classifying Hearing Impairment in Epidemiological Studies of Aging: The Wisconsin Age-Related Hearing Impairment Classification Scale

Overview
Journal Am J Audiol
Date 2020 Feb 4
PMID 32011900
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Longitudinal population-based cohort data were used to develop a standardized classification system for age-related hearing impairment using thresholds for frequencies (0.5-8 kHz) typically measured in cohort studies. Method Audiometric testing data collected in the Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study from participants ( = 1,369) with four visits (1993-1995, 1998-2000, 2003-2005, and 2009-2010) were included (10,952 audiograms). Cluster analyses (Wald's method) were used to identify audiometric patterns. Maximum allowable threshold values were defined for each cluster to create an ordered scale. Progression was defined as a two-step change. Results An eight-step scale was developed to capture audiogram shape and severity of hearing impairment. Of the 1,094 participants classified as having normal hearing based on a pure-tone average, only 25% ( = 277) were classified as Level 1 (all thresholds ≤ 20 dB HL) on the new scale, whereas 17% ( = 182) were Levels 4-6. During the 16-year follow-up, 64.9% of those at Level 1 progressed. There was little regression using this scale. Conclusions This is the first scale developed from population-based longitudinal cohort data to capture audiogram shape across time. This simple, standardized scale is easy to apply, reduces misclassification of normal hearing, and may be a useful method for identifying risk factors for early, preclinical, age-related changes in hearing.

Citing Articles

Easy as 1-2-3: Development and Evaluation of a Simple yet Valid Audiogram-Classification System.

Humes L, Zapala D Trends Hear. 2024; 28:23312165241260041.

PMID: 38870447 PMC: 11179497. DOI: 10.1177/23312165241260041.


U.S. Population Data on Hearing Loss, Trouble Hearing, and Hearing-Device Use in Adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011-12, 2015-16, and 2017-20.

Humes L Trends Hear. 2023; 27:23312165231160978.

PMID: 37016920 PMC: 10084570. DOI: 10.1177/23312165231160978.


Immediate Effects of (Simulated) Age-Related Hearing Loss on Cognitive Processing and Performance for the Backward-Digit-Span Task.

Fullgrabe C, Ozturk O Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14:912746.

PMID: 36420309 PMC: 9677092. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.912746.


Descriptions of Hearing Loss Severity Differentially Influence Parental Concern about the Impact of Childhood Hearing Loss.

Sapp C, McCreery R, Holte L, Oleson J, Walker E Ear Hear. 2022; 44(2):287-299.

PMID: 36314965 PMC: 10810141. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001280.


Using Automatic Speech Recognition to Optimize Hearing-Aid Time Constants.

Fontan L, Goncalves Braz L, Pinquier J, Stone M, Fullgrabe C Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:779062.

PMID: 35368250 PMC: 8969748. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.779062.


References
1.
Wiley T, Chappell R, Carmichael L, Nondahl D, Cruickshanks K . Changes in hearing thresholds over 10 years in older adults. J Am Acad Audiol. 2008; 19(4):281-92. PMC: 2802451. DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.19.4.2. View

2.
Cruickshanks K, Hamman R, Klein R, Nondahl D, Shetterly S . The prevalence of age-related maculopathy by geographic region and ethnicity. The Colorado-Wisconsin Study of Age-Related Maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997; 115(2):242-50. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150244015. View

3.
Dubno J, Eckert M, Lee F, Matthews L, Schmiedt R . Classifying human audiometric phenotypes of age-related hearing loss from animal models. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013; 14(5):687-701. PMC: 3767874. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-013-0396-x. View

4.
SCHUKNECHT H, Gacek M . Cochlear pathology in presbycusis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1993; 102(1 Pt 2):1-16. DOI: 10.1177/00034894931020S101. View

5.
Cruickshanks K, Wiley T, Tweed T, Klein B, Klein R, Nondahl D . Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1998; 148(9):879-86. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009713. View