» Articles » PMID: 32009826

Smartphone ECG Monitoring System Helps Lower Emergency Room and Clinic Visits in Post-Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Patients

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2020 Feb 4
PMID 32009826
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of using a smartphone-based electrocardiography (ECG) monitoring device (ECG Check) on the frequency of clinic or emergency room visits in patients who underwent ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods: Two groups of patients were identified and compared: The conventional monitoring group (CM group) included patients who were prescribed conventional event monitoring or Holter monitoring systems. The ECG Check group (EC group) included patients who were prescribed the ECG Check device for continuous monitoring in addition to conventional event monitoring. The primary outcome was the number of patient visits to clinic or emergency room. The feasibility, accuracy, and detection rate of mobile ECG Check were also evaluated.

Results: Ninety patients were studied (mean age: 66.2 ± 11 years, 64 males, mean CHADS-VASc score: 2.6 ± 2). In the EC group, forty-five patients sent an average of 52.8 ± 6 ECG records for either routine monitoring or symptoms of potential AF during the follow-up period. The rhythm strips identified sinus rhythm (84.7%), sinus tachycardia (8.4%), AF (4.2%), and atrial flutter (0.9%). Forty-two EC transmissions (1.8%) were uninterpretable. Six patients (13%) in the EC group were seen in the clinic or emergency room over a 100-day study period versus 16 (33%) in the standard care arm ( value < 0.001).

Conclusions: Use of smartphone-based ECG monitoring led to a significant reduction in AF-related visits to clinic or emergency department in the postablation period.

Citing Articles

Remote monitoring of atrial fibrillation recurrence using mHealth technology (REMOTE-AF).

Adasuriya G, Barsky A, Kralj-Hans I, Mohan S, Gill S, Chen Z Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024; 5(3):344-355.

PMID: 38774381 PMC: 11104468. DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae011.


Comprehensive atrial fibrillation burden and symptom reduction post-ablation: insights from DECAAF II.

Noujaim C, Assaf A, Lim C, Feng H, Younes H, Mekhael M Europace. 2024; 26(5).

PMID: 38646912 PMC: 11077606. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae104.


Electrocardiogram Devices for Home Use: Technological and Clinical Scoping Review.

Zepeda-Echavarria A, van de Leur R, van Sleuwen M, Hassink R, Wildbergh T, Doevendans P JMIR Cardio. 2023; 7:e44003.

PMID: 37418308 PMC: 10362423. DOI: 10.2196/44003.


The impact of home electrocardiograph measurement rate on the detection of atrial fibrillation recurrence after ablation: A prospective multicenter observational study.

Senoo K, Yukawa A, Ohkura T, Iwakoshi H, Nishimura T, Shimoo S Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2023; 44:101177.

PMID: 36820388 PMC: 9938453. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101177.


Use of digital health applications for the detection of atrial fibrillation.

Lawin D, Kuhn S, Schulze Lammers S, Lawrenz T, Stellbrink C Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2022; 33(4):373-379.

PMID: 35960358 DOI: 10.1007/s00399-022-00888-2.


References
1.
Mohanty S, Mohanty P, Di Biase L, Bai R, Santangeli P, Casella M . Results from a single-blind, randomized study comparing the impact of different ablation approaches on long-term procedure outcome in coexistent atrial fibrillation and flutter (APPROVAL). Circulation. 2013; 127(18):1853-60. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001855. View

2.
Piccini J, Mittal S, Snell J, Prillinger J, Dalal N, Varma N . Impact of remote monitoring on clinical events and associated health care utilization: A nationwide assessment. Heart Rhythm. 2016; 13(12):2279-2286. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.08.024. View

3.
Ricci R, Morichelli L, Santini M . Remote control of implanted devices through Home Monitoring technology improves detection and clinical management of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2008; 11(1):54-61. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eun303. View

4.
Zimetbaum P . Atrial Fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2017; 166(5):ITC33-ITC48. DOI: 10.7326/AITC201703070. View

5.
Varma N, Piccini J, Snell J, Fischer A, Dalal N, Mittal S . The Relationship Between Level of Adherence to Automatic Wireless Remote Monitoring and Survival in Pacemaker and Defibrillator Patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 65(24):2601-2610. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.033. View