Smartphone ECG Monitoring System Helps Lower Emergency Room and Clinic Visits in Post-Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Patients
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of using a smartphone-based electrocardiography (ECG) monitoring device (ECG Check) on the frequency of clinic or emergency room visits in patients who underwent ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF).
Methods: Two groups of patients were identified and compared: The conventional monitoring group (CM group) included patients who were prescribed conventional event monitoring or Holter monitoring systems. The ECG Check group (EC group) included patients who were prescribed the ECG Check device for continuous monitoring in addition to conventional event monitoring. The primary outcome was the number of patient visits to clinic or emergency room. The feasibility, accuracy, and detection rate of mobile ECG Check were also evaluated.
Results: Ninety patients were studied (mean age: 66.2 ± 11 years, 64 males, mean CHADS-VASc score: 2.6 ± 2). In the EC group, forty-five patients sent an average of 52.8 ± 6 ECG records for either routine monitoring or symptoms of potential AF during the follow-up period. The rhythm strips identified sinus rhythm (84.7%), sinus tachycardia (8.4%), AF (4.2%), and atrial flutter (0.9%). Forty-two EC transmissions (1.8%) were uninterpretable. Six patients (13%) in the EC group were seen in the clinic or emergency room over a 100-day study period versus 16 (33%) in the standard care arm ( value < 0.001).
Conclusions: Use of smartphone-based ECG monitoring led to a significant reduction in AF-related visits to clinic or emergency department in the postablation period.
Remote monitoring of atrial fibrillation recurrence using mHealth technology (REMOTE-AF).
Adasuriya G, Barsky A, Kralj-Hans I, Mohan S, Gill S, Chen Z Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024; 5(3):344-355.
PMID: 38774381 PMC: 11104468. DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae011.
Noujaim C, Assaf A, Lim C, Feng H, Younes H, Mekhael M Europace. 2024; 26(5).
PMID: 38646912 PMC: 11077606. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae104.
Electrocardiogram Devices for Home Use: Technological and Clinical Scoping Review.
Zepeda-Echavarria A, van de Leur R, van Sleuwen M, Hassink R, Wildbergh T, Doevendans P JMIR Cardio. 2023; 7:e44003.
PMID: 37418308 PMC: 10362423. DOI: 10.2196/44003.
Senoo K, Yukawa A, Ohkura T, Iwakoshi H, Nishimura T, Shimoo S Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2023; 44:101177.
PMID: 36820388 PMC: 9938453. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101177.
Use of digital health applications for the detection of atrial fibrillation.
Lawin D, Kuhn S, Schulze Lammers S, Lawrenz T, Stellbrink C Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2022; 33(4):373-379.
PMID: 35960358 DOI: 10.1007/s00399-022-00888-2.