» Articles » PMID: 32007142

Mortality Impact of Achieving WHO Cervical Cancer Elimination Targets: a Comparative Modelling Analysis in 78 Low-income and Lower-middle-income Countries

Abstract

Background: WHO is developing a global strategy towards eliminating cervical cancer as a public health problem, which proposes an elimination threshold of four cases per 100 000 women and includes 2030 triple-intervention coverage targets for scale-up of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination to 90%, twice-lifetime cervical screening to 70%, and treatment of pre-invasive lesions and invasive cancer to 90%. We assessed the impact of achieving the 90-70-90 triple-intervention targets on cervical cancer mortality and deaths averted over the next century. We also assessed the potential for the elimination initiative to support target 3.4 of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-a one-third reduction in premature mortality from non-communicable diseases by 2030.

Methods: The WHO Cervical Cancer Elimination Modelling Consortium (CCEMC) involves three independent, dynamic models of HPV infection, cervical carcinogenesis, screening, and precancer and invasive cancer treatment. Reductions in age-standardised rates of cervical cancer mortality in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) were estimated for three core scenarios: girls-only vaccination at age 9 years with catch-up for girls aged 10-14 years; girls-only vaccination plus once-lifetime screening and cancer treatment scale-up; and girls-only vaccination plus twice-lifetime screening and cancer treatment scale-up. Vaccination was assumed to provide 100% lifetime protection against infections with HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58, and to scale up to 90% coverage in 2020. Cervical screening involved HPV testing at age 35 years, or at ages 35 years and 45 years, with scale-up to 45% coverage by 2023, 70% by 2030, and 90% by 2045, and we assumed that 50% of women with invasive cervical cancer would receive appropriate surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy by 2023, which would increase to 90% by 2030. We summarised results using the median (range) of model predictions.

Findings: In 2020, the estimated cervical cancer mortality rate across all 78 LMICs was 13·2 (range 12·9-14·1) per 100 000 women. Compared to the status quo, by 2030, vaccination alone would have minimal impact on cervical cancer mortality, leading to a 0·1% (0·1-0·5) reduction, but additionally scaling up twice-lifetime screening and cancer treatment would reduce mortality by 34·2% (23·3-37·8), averting 300 000 (300 000-400 000) deaths by 2030 (with similar results for once-lifetime screening). By 2070, scaling up vaccination alone would reduce mortality by 61·7% (61·4-66·1), averting 4·8 million (4·1-4·8) deaths. By 2070, additionally scaling up screening and cancer treatment would reduce mortality by 88·9% (84·0-89·3), averting 13·3 million (13·1-13·6) deaths (with once-lifetime screening), or by 92·3% (88·4-93·0), averting 14·6 million (14·1-14·6) deaths (with twice-lifetime screening). By 2120, vaccination alone would reduce mortality by 89·5% (86·6-89·9), averting 45·8 million (44·7-46·4) deaths. By 2120, additionally scaling up screening and cancer treatment would reduce mortality by 97·9% (95·0-98·0), averting 60·8 million (60·2-61·2) deaths (with once-lifetime screening), or by 98·6% (96·5-98·6), averting 62·6 million (62·1-62·8) deaths (with twice-lifetime screening). With the WHO triple-intervention strategy, over the next 10 years, about half (48% [45-55]) of deaths averted would be in sub-Saharan Africa and almost a third (32% [29-34]) would be in South Asia; over the next 100 years, almost 90% of deaths averted would be in these regions. For premature deaths (age 30-69 years), the WHO triple-intervention strategy would result in rate reductions of 33·9% (24·4-37·9) by 2030, 96·2% (94·3-96·8) by 2070, and 98·6% (96·9-98·8) by 2120.

Interpretation: These findings emphasise the importance of acting immediately on three fronts to scale up vaccination, screening, and treatment for pre-invasive and invasive cervical cancer. In the next 10 years, a one-third reduction in the rate of premature mortality from cervical cancer in LMICs is possible, contributing to the realisation of the 2030 UN SDGs. Over the next century, successful implementation of the WHO elimination strategy would reduce cervical cancer mortality by almost 99% and save more than 62 million women's lives.

Funding: WHO, UNDP, UN Population Fund, UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Germany Federal Ministry of Health, National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, Centre for Research Excellence in Cervical Cancer Control, Canadian Institute of Health Research, Compute Canada, and Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé.

Citing Articles

Cost-effectiveness analysis of switching from a bivalent to a nonavalent HPV vaccination programme in China: a modelling study.

Gao M, Hu S, Zhao X, You T, Hong Y, Liu Y Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025; 56:101499.

PMID: 40061912 PMC: 11889945. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101499.


Cervical cancer stigma - A silent barrier to the elimination of cervical cancer.

Bae H, Temkin S Cancer. 2025; 131(5):e35776.

PMID: 40019322 PMC: 11869935. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35776.


Integrated cervical cancer screening uptake and associated factors among women attending primary care services at public health centres in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a multicentre cross-sectional study.

Kassa R, Gelaye K, Omigbodun A BMJ Public Health. 2025; 2(2):e001511.

PMID: 40018583 PMC: 11816944. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001511.


Modelling epidemiological and economics processes - the case of cervical cancer.

Taeger F, Mende L, Flessa S Health Econ Rev. 2025; 15(1):13.

PMID: 39985694 PMC: 11846406. DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00589-1.


Women's experiences and acceptability of self-administered, home delivered, intravaginal 5-Fluorouracil cream for cervical precancer treatment in Kenya.

Adewumi K, Kachoria A, Adoyo E, Rop M, Owaya A, Tang J Front Reprod Health. 2025; 7:1487264.

PMID: 39980670 PMC: 11839715. DOI: 10.3389/frph.2025.1487264.


References
1.
Arbyn M, Smith S, Temin S, Sultana F, Castle P . Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self samples: updated meta-analyses. BMJ. 2018; 363:k4823. PMC: 6278587. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k4823. View

2.
Paavonen J, Naud P, Salmeron J, Wheeler C, Chow S, Apter D . Efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by oncogenic HPV types (PATRICIA): final analysis of a double-blind, randomised study in young women. Lancet. 2009; 374(9686):301-14. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61248-4. View

3.
Brisson M, Laprise J, Drolet M, Van de Velde N, Franco E, Kliewer E . Comparative cost-effectiveness of the quadrivalent and bivalent human papillomavirus vaccines: a transmission-dynamic modeling study. Vaccine. 2013; 31(37):3863-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.064. View

4.
Burger E, Campos N, Sy S, Regan C, Kim J . Health and economic benefits of single-dose HPV vaccination in a Gavi-eligible country. Vaccine. 2018; 36(32 Pt A):4823-4829. PMC: 6066173. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.061. View

5.
Brisson M, Kim J, Canfell K, Drolet M, Gingras G, Burger E . Impact of HPV vaccination and cervical screening on cervical cancer elimination: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries. Lancet. 2020; 395(10224):575-590. PMC: 7043009. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30068-4. View