» Articles » PMID: 32006065

Air Contrast Enema Reduction of Single and Recurrent Ileocolic Intussusceptions in Children: Patterns, Management and Outcomes

Overview
Journal Pediatr Radiol
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2020 Feb 2
PMID 32006065
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is no consensus as to when surgical intervention should be considered for recurrent ileocolic intussusceptions in a stable patient after previous successful air contrast enema.

Objective: To review the patterns of ileocolic intussusceptions, air contrast enema success rates, and pathologic lead point rates in patients with and without recurrence to evaluate whether treatment outcomes depend on the number and timing between episodes.

Materials And Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 683 children with air contrast enema performed for ileocolic intussusception between January 2000 and May 2018. Recurrent intussusceptions were separated into mutually exclusive categories: short-term only (≤7 days between episodes) and long-term (>7 days between episodes) intussusceptions. Long-term recurrences included both long-term only and long- and short-term intussusceptions.

Results: Of the 683 patients, 606 (89%) had at least 1 successful air contrast enema. Of the 606, 115 (19%) had recurrent intussusceptions after successful reduction. The air contrast enema success rate for a single intussusception was 86% (491/568) and for recurrent intussusceptions was 96% (110/115) (P=0.004). Single and recurrent intussusceptions had similar pathologic lead point rates (3.5% vs. 4.3%; P=0.593). Short-term and long-term recurrences did not differ in air contrast enema success rates (96% vs. 95%). Long-term recurrences had higher pathologic lead point rate compared to short-term only (13% vs. 0%; P=0.003). Of short-term recurrences, 99% (76/77) were ≤5 intussusceptions; 92% had successful air contrast enema without surgery.

Conclusion: The majority of recurrent intussusceptions were successfully treated by air contrast enema. Short-term recurrences have lower pathologic lead point rates, suggesting that a higher surgical threshold may be plausible relative to long-term recurrences. In the appropriate clinical context, repeat air contrast enemas are a safe option for short-term recurrences, which can be attempted at least five times, potentially precluding the need for surgical intervention.

Citing Articles

Ketamine sedation during air enema reduction of pediatric intussusception: Assessing safety and intraluminal pressure.

Park J, Kim D, Chun M, Han J, Choi S, Lee J Pediatr Int. 2024; 66(1):e15835.

PMID: 39569888 PMC: 11580367. DOI: 10.1111/ped.15835.


Risk factors for failure of enema reduction of intussusception in children.

Alsinan T, Altokhais T, Alshayeb F, Hajja A, Al Boukai M, Alsalameh S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):20786.

PMID: 39242784 PMC: 11379803. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71289-3.


[The Effect of COVID-19 on Pediatric Intussusception: A Retrospective Study of a Single Center in South Korea with 10-Year Experience].

Yoo Y, Je B, Choi G, Lee J, Choi S, Lee J Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2022; 83(2):304-316.

PMID: 36237933 PMC: 9514438. DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0089.


Fluoroscopic criteria for on-site evaluation of failed intussusception reduction during air enema technique.

Kim H, Jeon T, Kim K, Yoo S, Choe Y, Lee S Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022; 12(7):3738-3747.

PMID: 35782238 PMC: 9246728. DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-1239.


The impact of social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic on rates of pediatric idiopathic intussusception.

Handa A, Callahan M, Kawai K, Tsai A Pediatr Radiol. 2021; 52(3):453-459.

PMID: 34626197 PMC: 8501347. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-021-05211-8.


References
1.
Niramis R, Watanatittan S, Kruatrachue A, Anuntkosol M, Buranakitjaroen V, Rattanasuwan T . Management of recurrent intussusception: nonoperative or operative reduction?. J Pediatr Surg. 2010; 45(11):2175-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.07.029. View

2.
Gray M, Li S, Hoffmann R, Gorelick M . Recurrence rates after intussusception enema reduction: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2014; 134(1):110-9. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-3102. View

3.
Khanna G, Applegate K . Ultrasound guided intussusception reduction: are we there yet?. Abdom Imaging. 2007; 33(1):38-40. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-007-9310-5. View

4.
Lessenich E, Kimia A, Mandeville K, Li J, Landschaft A, Tsai A . The Frequency of Postreduction Interventions After Successful Enema Reduction of Intussusception. Acad Emerg Med. 2015; 22(9):1042-7. DOI: 10.1111/acem.12741. View

5.
BENSON C, Lloyd J, Fischer H . Intussusception in infants and children. An analysis of 300 cases. Arch Surg. 1963; 86:745-51. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1963.01310110055008. View