External Validation and Comparison of the CardShock and IABP-SHOCK II Risk Scores in Real-world Cardiogenic Shock Patients
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Mortality from cardiogenic shock remains high and early recognition and risk stratification are mandatory for optimal patient allocation and to guide treatment strategy. The CardShock and the Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock (IABP-SHOCK II) risk scores have shown good results in predicting short-term mortality in cardiogenic shock. However, to date, they have not been compared in a large cohort of ischaemic and non-ischaemic real-world cardiogenic shock patients.
Methods: The Red-Shock is a multicentre cohort of non-selected cardiogenic shock patients. We calculated the CardShock and IABP-SHOCK II risk scores in each patient and assessed discrimination and calibration.
Results: We included 696 patients. The main cause of cardiogenic shock was acute coronary syndrome, occurring in 62% of the patients. Compared with acute coronary syndrome patients, non-acute coronary syndrome patients were younger and had a lower proportion of risk factors but higher rates of renal insufficiency; intra-aortic balloon pump was also less frequently used (31% vs 56%). In contrast, non-acute coronary syndrome patients were more often treated with mechanical circulatory support devices (11% vs 3%, <0.001 for both). Both risk scores were good predictors of in-hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients and had similar areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (area under the curve: 0.742 for the CardShock vs 0.752 for IABP-SHOCK II, =0.65). Their discrimination performance was only modest when applied to non-acute coronary syndrome patients (0.648 vs 0.619, respectively, =0.31). Calibration was acceptable for both scores (Hosmer-Lemeshow =0.22 for the CardShock and 0.68 for IABP-SHOCK II).
Conclusions: In our cohort, both the CardShock and the IABP-SHOCK II risk scores were good predictors of in-hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome-related cardiogenic shock.
Describing and Classifying Shock: Recent Insights.
Long A, Yehya A, Stelling K, Baran D US Cardiol. 2024; 15:e15.
PMID: 39720494 PMC: 11664766. DOI: 10.15420/usc.2021.09.
Alviar C, Li B, Keller N, Bohula-May E, Barnett C, Berg D Am Heart J. 2024; 270:1-12.
PMID: 38190931 PMC: 11032171. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.12.018.
Salam B, Al Zaidi M, Sprinkart A, Nowak S, Theis M, Kuetting D Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):22293.
PMID: 38102168 PMC: 10724270. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49454-x.
Ma J, Hu S, Hsieh M, Lee Y, Huang S, Chen K J Pers Med. 2023; 13(11).
PMID: 38003929 PMC: 10672116. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13111614.
Yamga E, Mantena S, Rosen D, Bucholz E, Yeh R, Celi L J Am Heart Assoc. 2023; 12(13):e029232.
PMID: 37345819 PMC: 10356069. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.122.029232.