» Articles » PMID: 32002019

Community Engagement and Ethical Global Health Research

Overview
Journal Glob Bioeth
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2020 Feb 1
PMID 32002019
Citations 67
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Community engagement is increasingly recognized as a critical element of medical research, recommended by ethicists, required by research funders and advocated in ethics guidelines. The benefits of community engagement are often stressed in instrumental terms, particularly with regard to promoting recruitment and retention in studies. Less emphasis has been placed on the value of community engagement with regard to ethical good practice, with goals often implied rather than clearly articulated. This article outlines explicitly how community engagement can contribute to ethical global health research by complementing existing established requirements such as informed consent and independent ethics review. The overarching and interlinked areas are (1) respecting individuals, communities and stakeholders; (2) building trust and social relationships; (3) determining appropriate benefits; minimizing risks, burdens and exploitation; (4) supporting the consent process; (5) understanding vulnerabilities and researcher obligations; (6) gaining permissions, approvals and building legitimacy and (7) achieving recruitment and retention targets.

Citing Articles

Community-structures that facilitate engagement in health research: Ifakara Health Research Institute-Bagamoyo case study.

Bategereza L, Olotu A, Kamuya D AAS Open Res. 2025; 4:13.

PMID: 40078895 PMC: 11303950. DOI: 10.12688/aasopenres.13187.2.


Promoting Racial Justice in Cancer Clinical Trials: Community Engaged Solutions for Bridging Gaps.

Williams D, Pflugeisen C, Ameen K, Chen T, Cooks S, Ray B Cancer Med. 2025; 14(4):e70690.

PMID: 39969108 PMC: 11837037. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70690.


Effective community engagement in one health research in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.

Sangong S, Saah F, Bain L One Health Outlook. 2025; 7(1):4.

PMID: 39810220 PMC: 11734441. DOI: 10.1186/s42522-024-00126-4.


Digital Democracy and Emergency Preparedness: Engaging the Public in Public Health.

Spitale G, Biller-Andorno N, Germani F, Merten S Int J Public Health. 2025; 69:1608004.

PMID: 39759544 PMC: 11695122. DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1608004.


Healthcare providers' and community stakeholders' perception of using drones for tuberculosis diagnosis in Nepal: an exploratory qualitative study.

Dixit K, Rai B, Majhi G, Paudel R, Dhital R, Acharya S BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1543.

PMID: 39633327 PMC: 11616345. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11824-0.


References
1.
Newby G, Hwang J, Koita K, Chen I, Greenwood B, von Seidlein L . Review of mass drug administration for malaria and its operational challenges. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015; 93(1):125-134. PMC: 4497884. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0254. View

2.
Molyneux C, Peshu N, Marsh K . Trust and informed consent: insights from community members on the Kenyan coast. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 61(7):1463-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.073. View

3.
Pell C, Adhikari B, Thwin M, Kajeechiwa L, Nosten S, Nosten F . Community engagement, social context and coverage of mass anti-malarial administration: Comparative findings from multi-site research in the Greater Mekong sub-Region. PLoS One. 2019; 14(3):e0214280. PMC: 6433231. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214280. View

4.
Kaehler N, Adhikari B, Cheah P, Day N, Paris D, Tanner M . The promise, problems and pitfalls of mass drug administration for malaria elimination: a qualitative study with scientists and policymakers. Int Health. 2018; 11(3):166-176. PMC: 6484636. DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihy079. View

5.
Newman P, Rubincam C, Slack C, Essack Z, Chakrapani V, Chuang D . Towards a Science of Community Stakeholder Engagement in Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials: An Embedded Four-Country Case Study. PLoS One. 2015; 10(8):e0135937. PMC: 4546590. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135937. View