» Articles » PMID: 32000743

Sun Protection Education for Adolescents: a Feasibility Study of a Wait-list Controlled Trial of an Intervention Involving a Presentation, Action Planning, and SMS Messages and Using Objective Measurement of Sun Exposure

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2020 Feb 1
PMID 32000743
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: People increase their risk of melanoma unless they are protected from the harmful effects of sun exposure during childhood and adolescence. We aimed to assess the feasibility of a three-component sun protection intervention- presentation, action planning, and SMS messages - and trial parameters.

Methods: This feasibility wait-list trial was conducted in the United Kingdom in 2018. Students aged 13-15 years were eligible. Feasibility outcomes were collected for recruitment rates; data availability rates for objective measurements of melanin and erythema using a Mexameter and self-reported sunburn occurrences, severity and body location, tanning, sun protection behaviours and Skin Self-Examination (SSE) collected before (baseline) and after the school summer holidays (follow-up); intervention reach, adherence, perceived impact and acceptability. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics; qualitative data were analysed thematically.

Results: Five out of eight schools expressing an interest in participating with four allocated to act as intervention and one control. Four parents/carers opted their child out of the study. Four hundred and eighty-seven out of 724 students on the school register consented to the study at baseline (67%). Three hundred and eighty-five were in intervention group schools. Objective skin measurements were available for 255 (66%) of the intervention group at baseline and 237 (61%) of the group at follow up. Melanin increased; erythema decreased. Complete self-report data were available for 247 (64%) students in the intervention group. The number of students on the school register who attended the presentation and given the booklet was 379 (98%) and gave their mobile phone number was 155 (40%). No intervention component was perceived as more impactful on sun protection behaviours. Adolescents did not see the relevance of sun protection in the UK or for their age group.

Conclusions: This is the first study to use a Mexameter to measure skin colour in adolescents. Erythema (visible redness) lasts no more than three days and its measurement before and after a six week summer holiday may not yield relevant or meaningful data. A major challenge is that adolescents do not see the relevance of sun protection and SSE.

Trial Registration: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN11141528. Date registered 0/2/03/2018; last edited 31/05/2018. Retrospectively registered.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of a facial-aging web app on sun protection behaviors among primary school students in Iran: a randomized controlled trial.

Okati-Aliabad H, Hosseini E, Sharifabad M, Mohammadi M, Ardakani M, Talebrouhi A BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):737.

PMID: 38454389 PMC: 10921649. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18241-2.


Determining the Content of a Melanoma Prevention and Care Mobile Application for Melanoma Patients: A Survey Study.

Ataee E, Shirkhoda M, Nahvijou A, Shahmoradi L, Ramezanghorbani N Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024; 25(2):409-418.

PMID: 38415525 PMC: 11077132. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.2.409.


A Review of the Impact of Sun Safety Interventions in Children.

Baig I, Petronzio A, Maphet B, Chon S Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023; 13(1).

PMID: 36892334 PMC: 9946084. DOI: 10.5826/dpc.1301a66.


Designing a Social Marketing-Based Intervention to Promote Sun-protective Behaviors among Urban Adolescent Boys: A Study Protocol.

Maleki M, Shams M, Roustaei N, Shakibazadeh E Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2022; 10(4):290-300.

PMID: 36274660 PMC: 9579451. DOI: 10.30476/IJCBNM.2022.94408.1988.


Effectiveness of Sun Protection Interventions Delivered to Adolescents in a Secondary School Setting: A Systematic Review.

McNoe B, Morgaine K, Reeder A J Skin Cancer. 2021; 2021:6625761.

PMID: 33747567 PMC: 7952177. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6625761.

References
1.
Wright C, Albers P, Oosthuizen M, Phala N . Self-reported sun-related knowledge, attitudes and behaviours among schoolchildren attending South African primary schools. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2014; 30(5):266-76. DOI: 10.1111/phpp.12107. View

2.
Gandini S, Sera F, Cattaruzza M, Pasquini P, Picconi O, Boyle P . Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: II. Sun exposure. Eur J Cancer. 2004; 41(1):45-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.10.016. View

3.
Qian C, Yuan C, Tan Y, Liu X, Dong Y, Yang L . Comparing performance of Chromameter®, Mexameter® and full-field laser perfusion imaging for measurement of ultraviolet B light-induced erythema. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2015; 40(4):438-40. DOI: 10.1111/ced.12589. View

4.
Olsen C, Zens M, Green A, Stukel T, Holman C, Mack T . Biologic markers of sun exposure and melanoma risk in women: pooled case-control analysis. Int J Cancer. 2010; 129(3):713-23. PMC: 3035752. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25691. View

5.
Arain M, Campbell M, Cooper C, Lancaster G . What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10:67. PMC: 2912920. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-67. View