» Articles » PMID: 32000173

Performance of 68Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT, Octreoscan SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Detection of Culprit Tumors Causing Osteomalacia: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Nucl Med Commun
Specialty Nuclear Medicine
Date 2020 Jan 31
PMID 32000173
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess and compare the performance of Ga-DOTA-conjugated-somatostatin-receptor-targeting-peptides (Ga-DOTA-SST) PET/CT, octreoscan-SPECT/CT and F-FDG-PET/CT in the detection of tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO).

Methods: Relevant studies reporting the performance Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT, octreoscan-SPECT/CT and F-FDG-PET/CT in TIO were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science (last updated June 2019). Two authors independently extracted the numbers of true and false positives, and true and false negatives. The pooled estimates on a per-patient basis were calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI) obtained using a random-effects model.

Results: Fourteen studies comprising 346 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis provided the following results on a per-patient analysis. The pooled sensitivities of both Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT (90%, 95% CI 82-95%) and octreoscan-SPECT/CT (83%, 95% CI 75-89%) were found to be significantly higher (P < 0.005) than that of F-FDG PET/CT (67%, 95% CI 53-80%). There was no statistically significant difference between the sensitivity of Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT and octreoscan-SPECT/CT (P = 0.161). Owing to the low number of articles with true negative findings, the pooled specificities were not calculated. A total of 287 tumors were identified in 287 patients according to the data the included studies offered. The majority of the tumors were located in the lower extremities (59.6%, 171/287), followed by craniofacial regions (24.0%, 69/287), torso (9.4%%, 27/287), and upper extremities (6.9%, 20/287).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrates that somatostatin receptor-based imaging modalities outperformed F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of TIO, with Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT performing slightly better than octreoscan-SPECT/CT.

Citing Articles

Intracranial phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor: A rare case report and systematic review.

Song S, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Liu W, Wang Z Medicine (Baltimore). 2025; 104(8):e41623.

PMID: 39993076 PMC: 11857024. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041623.


Unusual Association of Partial Fanconi Syndrome and Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia Revealed by Multiple Vertebral Fractures.

Debrach A, Coen M, de Seigneux S, Saiji E, Boudabbous S, Willi J Calcif Tissue Int. 2025; 116(1):36.

PMID: 39888445 PMC: 11785680. DOI: 10.1007/s00223-025-01344-2.


Acquired hypophosphatemic osteomalacia: case series from a Peruvian referral center (1999-2023).

Paz-Ibarra J, Saenz-Bustamante S, Inostroza-Fernandez M, Hermenegildo P, Lescano L, Concepcion-Zavaleta M Arch Osteoporos. 2024; 19(1):116.

PMID: 39560849 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01476-2.


Diagnostic approach to rickets: an Endocrine Society of Bengal (ESB) consensus statement.

Roy A, Chowdhury A, Ray A, Baidya A, Roychowdhury B, Sarkar D Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2024; 29(5):284-307.

PMID: 39506343 PMC: 11541088. DOI: 10.6065/apem.2448044.022.


Osteolytic mystery: A rare case of pathologic fracture from a phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor in hip and femur.

Aldoghmi M, Ho E, OConnell R, Houshyar R Radiol Case Rep. 2024; 19(10):4413-4416.

PMID: 39185431 PMC: 11342086. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.07.036.


References
1.
Jagtap V, Sarathi V, Lila A, Malhotra G, Sankhe S, Bandgar T . Tumor-induced osteomalacia: a single center experience. Endocr Pract. 2010; 17(2):177-84. DOI: 10.4158/EP10151.OR. View

2.
Lee Y, Lee J, Lee J, Lee H, Park B, Kim Y . Hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance of multidetector CT and MR imaging-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2015; 275(1):97-109. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140690. View

3.
Carpenter T . Oncogenic osteomalacia--a complex dance of factors. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(17):1705-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe030037. View

4.
Whiting P, Rutjes A, Westwood M, Mallett S, Deeks J, Reitsma J . QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155(8):529-36. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009. View

5.
Zhou J, Gou Z, Wu R, Yuan Y, Yu G, Zhao Y . Comparison of PSMA-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, NaF-PET/CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol. 2019; 48(12):1915-1924. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-019-03230-z. View