» Articles » PMID: 31993669

The Role of Trait Empathy in the Processing of Observed Actions in a False-belief Task

Overview
Date 2020 Jan 30
PMID 31993669
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Empathic brain responses are characterized by overlapping activations between active experience and observation of an emotion in another person, with the pattern for observation being modulated by trait empathy. Also for self-performed and observed errors, similar brain activity has been described, but findings concerning the role of empathy are mixed. We hypothesized that trait empathy modulates the processing of observed responses if expectations concerning the response are based on the beliefs of the observed person. In the present study, we utilized a false-belief task in which observed person's and observer's task-related knowledge were dissociated and errors and correct responses could be expected or unexpected. While theta power was generally modulated by the expectancy of the observed response, a negative mediofrontal event-related potential (ERP) component was more pronounced for unexpected observed actions only in participants with higher trait empathy (assessed by the Empathy Quotient), as revealed by linear mixed effects analyses. Cognitive and affective empathy, assessed by the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, were not significantly related to the ERP component. The results suggest that trait empathy can facilitate the generation of predictions and thereby modulate specific aspects of the processing of observed actions, while the contributions of specific empathy components remain unclear.

Citing Articles

Slip or fallacy? Effects of error severity on own and observed pitch error processing in pianists.

Albrecht C, Bellebaum C Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023; 23(4):1076-1094.

PMID: 37198385 PMC: 10400674. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-023-01097-1.


The impact of social anxiety on feedback-based go and nogo learning.

Peterburs J, Albrecht C, Bellebaum C Psychol Res. 2021; 86(1):110-124.

PMID: 33527222 PMC: 8821493. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01479-5.

References
1.
Koban L, Pourtois G, Bediou B, Vuilleumier P . Effects of social context and predictive relevance on action outcome monitoring. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012; 12(3):460-78. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-012-0091-0. View

2.
Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S . The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. J Autism Dev Disord. 2004; 34(2):163-75. DOI: 10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00. View

3.
Pezzetta R, Nicolardi V, Tidoni E, Aglioti S . Error, rather than its probability, elicits specific electrocortical signatures: a combined EEG-immersive virtual reality study of action observation. J Neurophysiol. 2018; 120(3):1107-1118. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00130.2018. View

4.
Shamay-Tsoory S, Aharon-Peretz J, Perry D . Two systems for empathy: a double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain. 2008; 132(Pt 3):617-27. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awn279. View

5.
Liu Y, West S, Levy R, Aiken L . Tests of Simple Slopes in Multiple Regression Models with an Interaction: Comparison of Four Approaches. Multivariate Behav Res. 2017; 52(4):445-464. DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2017.1309261. View