» Articles » PMID: 31992317

Exploring Barriers to Seeking Health Care Among Kenyan Somali Women with Female Genital Mutilation: a Qualitative Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2020 Jan 30
PMID 31992317
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is a cultural practice associated with health consequences, women rights and deprivation of dignity. Despite FGM/C-related health consequences, circumcised women may encounter additional challenges while seeking interventions for reproductive health problems. Experiences of women/girls while accessing health services for reproductive health problems including FGM/C-related complications in poor, remote and hard to reach areas is poorly understood. We sought to explore barriers to care seeking among Somali women with complications related to FGM/C in public health facilities in Kenya.

Methods: We drew on qualitative data collected from purposively selected women aged 15-49 years living with FGM/C, their partners, community leaders, and health providers in Nairobi and Garissa Counties. Data were collected using in-depth interviews (n = 10), key informant interviews (n = 23) and 20 focus group discussions. Data were transcribed and analyzed thematically using NVivo version 12.

Results: Barriers were grouped into four thematic categories. Structural barriers to care-seeking, notably high cost of care, distance from health facilities, and lack of a referral system. Concerns regarding perceived quality of care also presented a barrier. Women questioned health professionals' and health facilities' capacity to offer culturally-sensitive FGM/C-specific care, plus ensuring confidentiality and privacy. Women faced socio-cultural barriers while seeking care particularly cultural taboos against discussing matters related to sexual health with male clinicians. Additionally, fear of legal sanctions given the anti-FGM/C law deterred women with FGM/C-related complications from seeking healthcare.

Conclusion: Structural, socio-cultural, quality of service, and legal factors limit health seeking for reproductive health problems including FGM/C-related complications. Strengthening health system should consider integration of FGM/C-related interventions with existing maternal child health services for cost effectiveness, efficiency and quality care. The interventions should address health-related financial, physical and communication barriers, while ensuring culturally-sensitive and confidential care.

Citing Articles

Female genital mutilation: trends, economic burden of delay and basis for public health interventions.

Cordova-Pozo K, Abdalla H, Moller A Int J Equity Health. 2024; 23(1):73.

PMID: 38622689 PMC: 11020991. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02140-4.


Factors Linked to Female Genital Mutilation Practice Among Women Living In Alungu Village of Mandera County, Kenya.

Sheikh M, Cheptum J, Mageto I East Afr Health Res J. 2023; 7(1):109-115.

PMID: 37529498 PMC: 10388673. DOI: 10.24248/eahrj.v7i1.716.


A Systematic Review of Criminal Justice Initiatives to Strengthen the Criminal Investigation and Prosecution of Sexual Violence in East Africa.

Rockowitz S, Wagner K, Cooper R, Stevens L, Davies K, Woodhams J Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023; 25(1):813-827.

PMID: 37057398 PMC: 10666499. DOI: 10.1177/15248380231165694.


"You must cut that long and stinking thing": uncovering the lived experiences of uncircumcised pokot women in North-Eastern Uganda.

Kalengo N, Musinguzi L, Twikirize J BMC Womens Health. 2022; 22(1):433.

PMID: 36333698 PMC: 9636792. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-02005-4.


Factors Influencing the Efficiency of Public Hospitals in Saudi Arabia: A Qualitative Study Exploring Stakeholders' Perspectives and Suggestions for Improvement.

Alatawi A, Niessen L, Bhardwaj M, Alhassan Y, Khan J Front Public Health. 2022; 10:922597.

PMID: 35784214 PMC: 9243553. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.922597.


References
1.
Dawson A, Homer C, Turkmani S, Black K, Varol N . A systematic review of doctors' experiences and needs to support the care of women with female genital mutilation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015; 131(1):35-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.033. View

2.
Rouzi A . Facts and controversies on female genital mutilation and Islam. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2013; 18(1):10-4. DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2012.749982. View

3.
Collinet P, Sabban F, Lucot J, Boukerrou M, Stien L, Leroy J . [Management of type III female genital mutilation]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2005; 33(8):720-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0368-2315(04)96633-1. View

4.
Ahmed M, Shaaban M, Meky H, Amin Arafa M, Mohamed T, Gharib W . Psychological impact of female genital mutilation among adolescent Egyptian girls: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017; 22(4):280-285. DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2017.1355454. View

5.
Diop N, Askew I . The effectiveness of a community-based education program on abandoning female genital mutilation/cutting in Senegal. Stud Fam Plann. 2012; 40(4):307-18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2009.00213.x. View