» Articles » PMID: 31983305

Influence of Age on Upper Arm Cuff Blood Pressure Measurement

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) is a leading global risk factor. Increasing age is related to changes in cardiovascular physiology that could influence cuff BP measurement, but this has never been examined systematically and was the aim of this study. Cuff BP was compared with invasive aortic BP across decades of age (from 40 to 89 years) using individual-level data from 31 studies (1674 patients undergoing coronary angiography) and 22 different cuff BP devices (19 oscillometric, 1 automated auscultation, 2 mercury sphygmomanometry) from the Invasive Blood Pressure Consortium. Subjects were aged 64±11 years, and 32% female. Cuff systolic BP overestimated invasive aortic systolic BP in those aged 40 to 49 years, but with each older decade of age, there was a progressive shift toward increasing underestimation of aortic systolic BP (<0.0001). Conversely, cuff diastolic BP overestimated invasive aortic diastolic BP, and this progressively increased with increasing age (<0.0001). Thus, there was a progressive increase in cuff pulse pressure underestimation of invasive aortic PP with increasing decades of age (<0.0001). These age-related trends were observed across all categories of BP control. We conclude that cuff BP as an estimate of aortic BP was substantially influenced by increasing age, thus potentially exposing older people to greater chance for misdiagnosis of the true risk related to BP.

Citing Articles

Mean arterial pressure differences between cuff oscillometric and invasive blood pressure.

Picone D, Schultz M, Armstrong M, Black J, Dwyer N, Roberts-Thomson P Hypertens Res. 2025; .

PMID: 40033142 DOI: 10.1038/s41440-025-02165-4.


Ideal cardiovascular health index and high-normal blood pressure in elderly people: evidence based on real-world data.

Ren Y, Cheng L, Song Y, Yang Y, Xiang L, Wei C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):10166.

PMID: 38702348 PMC: 11068865. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60906-w.


Validation of a Suprasystolic Cuff System for Static and Dynamic Representation of the Central Pressure Waveform.

Tamborini A, Gharib M J Am Heart Assoc. 2024; 13(8):e033290.

PMID: 38591330 PMC: 11262511. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033290.


Comparisons of an automated oscillometric device with a hybrid manual auscultatory device for the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Kim Y, Park S, Shin J, Sung K, Ihm S, Kim S J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024; 26(5):532-542.

PMID: 38552166 PMC: 11088422. DOI: 10.1111/jch.14805.


Can Currently Available Non-invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Monitors Replace Invasive Measurement With an Arterial Catheter?.

Gore P, Liu H, Bohringer C Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e54707.

PMID: 38529464 PMC: 10961923. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54707.


References
1.
Sharman J, Marwick T . Accuracy of blood pressure monitoring devices: a critical need for improvement that could resolve discrepancy in hypertension guidelines. J Hum Hypertens. 2018; 33(2):89-93. DOI: 10.1038/s41371-018-0122-6. View

2.
Yong P, Geddes L . The effect of cuff pressure deflation rate on accuracy in indirect measurement of blood pressure with the auscultatory method. J Clin Monit. 1987; 3(3):155-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF01695937. View

3.
Messerli F, Bangalore S . The Blood Pressure Landscape: Schism Among Guidelines, Confusion Among Physicians, and Anxiety Among Patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72(11):1313-1316. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.026. View

4.
Mancia G, Grassi G . Aggressive blood pressure lowering is dangerous: the J-curve: pro side of the arguement. Hypertension. 2013; 63(1):29-36. DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000441190.09494.e9. View

5.
Kuwajima I, Hoh E, Suzuki Y, Matsushita S, Kuramoto K . Pseudohypertension in the elderly. J Hypertens. 1990; 8(5):429-32. DOI: 10.1097/00004872-199005000-00006. View