Effect of Chronic Stretching Interventions on the Mechanical Properties of Muscles in Patients with Stroke: A Systematic Review
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Muscle contractures are common after stroke and their treatment usually involves stretching. However, recent meta-analyses concluded that stretching does not increase passive joint amplitudes in patients with stroke. The effectiveness of treatment is usually evaluated by measuring range of motion alone; however, assessing the effects of stretching on the structural and mechanical properties of muscle by evaluating the torque-angle relationship can help in understanding the effects of stretching. Although several studies have evaluated this, the effects remain unclear.
Objective: A systematic review of the literature on the effectiveness of stretching procedures for which the outcomes included a measurement of torque associated with range of motion or muscle structure (e.g., fascicle length) in stroke survivors.
Methods: PubMed, ScienceDirect and PEDro databases were searched by 2 independent reviewers for relevant studies on the effects of chronic stretching interventions (>4 weeks) that evaluated joint angle and passive torque or muscle structure or stiffness. The quality of the studies was assessed with the PEDro scale.
Results: Eight randomized clinical trials (total of 290 participants) met the inclusion criteria, with highly variable sample characteristics (at risk/existing contractures), program objectives (prevent/treat contractures) and duration (from 4 to 52 weeks) and volume of stretching (1 to 586 hr). All studies were classified as high quality (>6/10 PEDro score). Six studies focused on the upper limb. Many programs were less than 12 weeks (n=7 studies) and did not change mechanical/structural properties. The longest intervention (52 weeks) increased muscle fascicle length and thickness (plantar flexors).
Conclusion: Long interventions involving high stretching volumes and/or loads may have effects on muscle/joint mechanical properties, for preventing/treating contractures after stroke injury, but need to be further explored before firm conclusions are drawn.
Belghith K, Zidi M, Vincent L, Fedele J, Bou-Serhal R, Maktouf W Front Neurol. 2025; 15:1398860.
PMID: 39917437 PMC: 11798797. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1398860.
Clinical Outcome Assessments for Spasticity: Review, Critique, and Recommendations.
Gal O, Baude M, Deltombe T, Esquenazi A, Gracies J, Hoskovcova M Mov Disord. 2024; 40(1):22-43.
PMID: 39629752 PMC: 11752990. DOI: 10.1002/mds.30062.
Zhang Q, Wang Y, Zhou M, Li D, Yan J, Liu Q NeuroRehabilitation. 2023; 53(4):567-576.
PMID: 37927286 PMC: 10789316. DOI: 10.3233/NRE-230173.
Campanini I, Bo M, Bassi M, Damiano B, Scaltriti S, Lusuardi M PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0287220.
PMID: 37824499 PMC: 10569611. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287220.
How Does Stroke Affect Skeletal Muscle? State of the Art and Rehabilitation Perspective.
Azzollini V, Dalise S, Chisari C Front Neurol. 2022; 12:797559.
PMID: 35002937 PMC: 8733480. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.797559.