» Articles » PMID: 31979364

A Literature Review and Gap Analysis of Emerging Technologies and New Trends in Gambling

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Jan 26
PMID 31979364
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There have been significant changes in the gambling landscape particularly relating to gambling in the digital age. As the gambling landscape changes, regulation of gambling also needs to change. In 2018, the Office of Responsible Gambling in New South Wales, Australia, commissioned a gap analysis to inform their research objectives and priority focus areas. This included an identification of gaps in our understanding of emerging technologies and new trends in gambling. A gap analysis of the peer-reviewed literature published since 2015 was undertaken, identifying 116 articles. The main area of focus was Internet gambling, followed by articles exploring the relationship between video gaming and gambling, the expansion of the sports betting market, Electronic Gambling Machines characteristics and articles exploring new technologies and trends in advertising and inducements. Key gaps related to the need for more research in general, as well as research focusing on subpopulations such as those using different gambling formats, those with varying levels of problem gambling, and vulnerable populations. From a methods perspective, researchers saw the need for longitudinal studies, more qualitative research and improved outcome measures. The development and testing of a public health approach to addressing the harms associated with gambling in these areas is needed.

Citing Articles

The Role of Social Deficits in the Link Between Social Gambling Motives and Problem Gambling.

Floyd C, Connolly A, Tahk R, Stall L, Kraus S, Grubbs J J Gambl Stud. 2025; .

PMID: 39825122 DOI: 10.1007/s10899-025-10374-2.


Promoting safer gambling through social norms and goal setting: A qualitative process analysis of participants' experiences in the EROGamb 2.0 feasibility trial.

Bush-Evans R, Arden-Close E, Thomas S, McAlaney J, Wang R, Bolat E Internet Interv. 2025; 38:100790.

PMID: 39764431 PMC: 11702003. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100790.


Exploring the Differences in Positive Play among Various Sports Wagering Behaviors.

Connolly A, Stall L, Floyd C, Kraus S, Grubbs J J Gambl Stud. 2024; .

PMID: 38652388 DOI: 10.1007/s10899-024-10304-8.


Gambling in a U.S. Census Matched Sample: Examining Interactions between Means and Motives in Predicting Problematic Outcomes.

Floyd C, Kraus S, Grubbs J J Gambl Stud. 2024; 40(3):1399-1421.

PMID: 38592616 PMC: 11390859. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-024-10302-w.


Availability restrictions and mandatory precommitment in land-based gambling: effects on online substitutes and total consumption in longitudinal sales data.

Marionneau V, Selin J, Impinen A, Roukka T BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):809.

PMID: 38486180 PMC: 10941527. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18325-z.


References
1.
Sanders J, Williams R . The Relationship Between Video Gaming, Gambling, and Problematic Levels of Video Gaming and Gambling. J Gambl Stud. 2018; 35(2):559-569. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-018-9798-3. View

2.
Hing N, Russell A, Li E, Vitartas P . Does the uptake of wagering inducements predict impulse betting on sport?. J Behav Addict. 2018; 7(1):146-157. PMC: 6035013. DOI: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.17. View

3.
Molde H, Holmoy B, Merkesdal A, Torsheim T, Mentzoni R, Hanns D . Are Video Games a Gateway to Gambling? A Longitudinal Study Based on a Representative Norwegian Sample. J Gambl Stud. 2018; 35(2):545-557. PMC: 6517345. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-018-9781-z. View

4.
Hing N, Sproston K, Brook K, Brading R . The Structural Features of Sports and Race Betting Inducements: Issues for Harm Minimisation and Consumer Protection. J Gambl Stud. 2016; 33(2):685-704. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-016-9642-6. View

5.
Dwyer B, Weiner J . Daily Grind: A Comparison of Causality Orientations, Emotions, and Fantasy Sport Participation. J Gambl Stud. 2017; 34(1):1-20. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-017-9684-4. View