» Articles » PMID: 31979188

Nitrogen Preferences During Alcoholic Fermentation of Different Non- Yeasts of Oenological Interest

Overview
Journal Microorganisms
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2020 Jan 26
PMID 31979188
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Non- yeasts have long been considered spoilage microorganisms. Currently, oenological interest in those species is increasing, mostly due to their positive contribution to wine quality. In this work, the fermentative capacity and nitrogen consumption of several non- wine yeast ( and ) were analyzed. For this purpose, synthetic must with three different nitrogen compositions was used: a mixture of amino acids and ammonium, only organic or inorganic nitrogen. The fermentation kinetics, nitrogen consumption, and yeast growth were measured over time. Our results showed that the good fermentative strains, and , had high similarities with in terms of growth, fermentation profile, and nitrogen assimilation preferences, although presented an impaired behavior when only amino acids or ammonia were used, being strain-specific. was the non- strain least affected by the nitrogen composition of the medium. The other two poor fermentative strains, and , behaved similarly regarding amino acid uptake, which occurred earlier than that of the good fermentative species in the absence of ammonia. The results obtained in single non- fermentations highlighted the importance of controlling nitrogen requirements of the wine yeasts, mainly in sequential fermentations, in order to manage a proper nitrogen supplementation, when needed.

Citing Articles

Melatonin-protein interactions are dependent on yeast carbon metabolism.

Morcillo-Parra M, Martin-Esteban S, Almellones J, Mas A, Beltran G, Torija M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8947.

PMID: 40089602 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-93440-4.


Adaptive Laboratory Evolution and Carbon/Nitrogen Imbalance Promote High-Yield Ammonia Release in .

Pessina A, Giancontieri A, Sassi T, Busti S, Vanoni M, Brambilla L Microorganisms. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40005635 PMC: 11858359. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms13020268.


Enhancing Mezcal Production Efficiency by Adding an Inoculant of Native to a Standardized Fermentation Must.

Holguin-Loya A, Salazar-Herrera A, Soto-Cruz N, Kirchmayr M, Lopes C, Rojas-Contreras J Foods. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941935 PMC: 11817156. DOI: 10.3390/foods14030341.


Fermentative Characteristics and Metabolic Profiles of Japanese Apricot Juice Fermented with and .

Papun B, Wongputtisin P, Kanpiengjai A, Pisithkul T, Manochai P, Manowan K Foods. 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39517240 PMC: 11544973. DOI: 10.3390/foods13213455.


Different Nitrogen Consumption Patterns in Low Temperature Fermentations in the Wine Yeast .

Garcia-Rios E, Pardo J, Su Y, Guillamon J Foods. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39200449 PMC: 11354071. DOI: 10.3390/foods13162522.


References
1.
Gomez-Alonso S, Hermosin-Gutierrez I, Garcia-Romero E . Simultaneous HPLC analysis of biogenic amines, amino acids, and ammonium ion as aminoenone derivatives in wine and beer samples. J Agric Food Chem. 2007; 55(3):608-13. DOI: 10.1021/jf062820m. View

2.
Contreras A, Hidalgo C, Henschke P, Chambers P, Curtin C, Varela C . Evaluation of non-Saccharomyces yeasts for the reduction of alcohol content in wine. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013; 80(5):1670-8. PMC: 3957604. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03780-13. View

3.
Rollero S, Bloem A, Ortiz-Julien A, Camarasa C, Divol B . Fermentation performances and aroma production of non-conventional wine yeasts are influenced by nitrogen preferences. FEMS Yeast Res. 2018; 18(5). DOI: 10.1093/femsyr/foy055. View

4.
Bely M, Stoeckle P, Masneuf-Pomarede I, Dubourdieu D . Impact of mixed Torulaspora delbrueckii-Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on high-sugar fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008; 122(3):312-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.12.023. View

5.
Albertin W, Zimmer A, Miot-Sertier C, Bernard M, Coulon J, Moine V . Combined effect of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae lag phase and the non-Saccharomyces consortium to enhance wine fruitiness and complexity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017; 101(20):7603-7620. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-017-8492-1. View