» Articles » PMID: 31977643

Neck and Inspiratory Muscle Recruitment During Inspiratory Loading and Neck Flexion

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2020 Jan 25
PMID 31977643
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare muscle activation of the diaphragm (DIA), scalenes (SA), parasternal intercostals (PS), and sternomastoid (SM) during submaximal intermittent neck flexion (INF) versus submaximal inspiratory threshold loading (ITL) until task failure in healthy adults.

Methods: Twelve healthy adults performed submaximal ITL or INF tests in random order for 2 d. Surface electromyography was monitored to acquire root mean square (RMS) and median power frequency (MPF) from the SA, PS, SM, and DIA. Maximal inspiratory pressures and maximal voluntary contraction for neck flexion were determined. Next, participants performed the first submaximal test-ITL or INF-targeting 50% ± 5% of the maximal inspiratory pressure or maximal voluntary contraction, respectively, until task failure. After a rest, they performed the other test until task failure. Two days later, they performed ITL and INF but in the opposite order. The Borg scale assessed breathlessness and perceived exertion.

Results: Endurance times for ITL and INF were 38.1 and 26.3 min, respectively. INF activated three of four inspiratory muscles at higher average RMS (PS, SM, and SA) and at different MPF (PS, SM, and DIA but not SA) compared with ITL. During ITL, RMS did not change in the four inspiratory muscles over time, but MPF decreased in PS, SM, and SA (P < 0.04). In contrast, RMS increased in three of four inspiratory muscles (SM, PS, and SA) during INF, but MPF did not change throughout its duration. Borg rating was 3.9-fold greater than ITL compared with INF.

Conclusion: At a similar percentage of maximal load, INF evokes greater activation of primary muscles of inspiration (PS and SA) and a major accessory muscle of inspiration (SM) compared with ITL during a prolonged submaximal protocol.

Citing Articles

Intermittent neck flexion induces greater sternocleidomastoid deoxygenation than inspiratory threshold loading.

Miles M, Davenport P, Mathur S, Goligher E, Rozenberg D, Reid W Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023; 124(4):1151-1161.

PMID: 37923886 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-023-05338-6.


High-Intensity Inspiratory Muscle Training Improves Scalene and Sternocleidomastoid Muscle Oxygenation Parameters in Patients With Weaning Difficulties: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Van Hollebeke M, Poddighe D, Clerckx B, Muller J, Hermans G, Gosselink R Front Physiol. 2022; 13:786575.

PMID: 35222072 PMC: 8864155. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.786575.


Time to Move Beyond a "One-Size Fits All" Approach to Inspiratory Muscle Training.

Shei R, Paris H, Sogard A, Mickleborough T Front Physiol. 2022; 12:766346.

PMID: 35082689 PMC: 8784843. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.766346.


Semi-automated Detection of the Timing of Respiratory Muscle Activity: Validation and First Application.

Rodrigues A, Janssens L, Langer D, Matsumura U, Rozenberg D, Brochard L Front Physiol. 2022; 12:794598.

PMID: 35046839 PMC: 8762204. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.794598.


Hemodynamics of the sternocleidomastoid measured with frequency domain near-infrared spectroscopy towards non-invasive monitoring during mechanical ventilation.

Istfan R, Gomez C, Applegate M, Rozenberg D, Reid W, Roblyer D Biomed Opt Express. 2021; 12(7):4147-4162.

PMID: 34457405 PMC: 8367268. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.430423.